> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus. This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.
Proof of stake literally makes rich richer, thats the point of it - holders can mint new blocks. With proof of work there is actual work involved tol, not just minting money with your capital.
Children Playing Blockchain
31–40 of 104 posts
Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#32A third class plays using a consensus model based on explicit relationships of trust. Each student keeps track of which of the others they consider trustworthy. Since they all play together everyday, they know who is nice, and who is naughty. When a supermajority trusts the student placing a new block, that student is allowed to place it anywhere. When not enough people trust the student placing the block, they preve…
Which cryptocurrency does this describe?
Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#33A third class plays using a consensus model based on explicit relationships of trust. Each student keeps track of which of the others they consider trustworthy. Since they all play together everyday, they know who is nice, and who is naughty. When a supermajority trusts the student placing a new block, that student is allowed to place it anywhere. When not enough people trust the student placing the block, they preve…
Which cryptocurrency does this describe?
Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#34A third class plays using a consensus model based on explicit relationships of trust. Each student keeps track of which of the others they consider trustworthy. Since they all play together everyday, they know who is nice, and who is naughty. When a supermajority trusts the student placing a new block, that student is allowed to place it anywhere. When not enough people trust the student placing the block, they preve…
I could be misunderstanding, but I think the problem with this approach is the lack of permanent identity. What's a "supermajority"? Could I get it by making a bunch of fake identities and having them all "trust" me? Alternatively, we could ask for a supermajority of coins, and then I think we've re-invented proof-of-stake.
Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#35> but without 2 years of constantly solving sudoku under their belt, they couldn't compete with the more experienced sudoku-solvers Inaccurate analogy. Miners are more limited by cheap electricity/cooling than CPU which is more generally available.
Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#36A third class plays using a consensus model based on explicit relationships of trust. Each student keeps track of which of the others they consider trustworthy. Since they all play together everyday, they know who is nice, and who is naughty. When a supermajority trusts the student placing a new block, that student is allowed to place it anywhere. When not enough people trust the student placing the block, they preve…
> Each student keeps track of which of the others they consider trustworthy. How do you turn that into code?
Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#37> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus. This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.
Proof of stake literally makes rich richer, thats the point of it - holders can mint new blocks. With proof of work there is actual work involved tol, not just minting money with your capital.
Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#38Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#39Re: Children Playing Blockchain
#40There's no way to save the fundamentally terrible design of guessing random numbers to verify a ledger. These are "solutions" to problems that are self created.