Live data from Hacker News

Children Playing Blockchain

jott.live

1–10 of 104 posts

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#2
> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus.

This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#3
post #2

> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus. This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.

I would contest that assertion - some blockchains regularly change their PoW algorithm in an attempt to stay "ASIC-resistant."

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#4
I found the site's architecture quite interesting: It uses inline JS to transform the Markdown in HTML. view-source:https://jott.live/markdown/elementary_blockchain

Ideally it would be as a Service Worker that pulls pages and transforms them into HTML, so you could serve your Markdown directly, without a separate build step.

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#5
post #2

> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus. This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.

I would contest that assertion - some blockchains regularly change their PoW algorithm in an attempt to stay "ASIC-resistant."

That simply makes two currencies - before-fork, and after-fork. There's no rule that the one that "should" win does, especially in the face of large computing power making the former more attractive. See Bitcoin Cash, versus Bitcoin Classic.

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#6
post #2

> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus. This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.

I would contest that assertion - some blockchains regularly change their PoW algorithm in an attempt to stay "ASIC-resistant."

Ok. Perhaps not every proof-of-work currency, but a vast amount of them still suffer from the issue I mentioned.

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#7
post #2

> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus. This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.

But at the end of the day, PoW is simply a fee that users of the network pay (in the form of inflation) to secure the network. I'm not convinced it's really a distribution mechanism.

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#8
Funny.

The first class was a public class & anybody could join in at any time. The second class had reserved early seats based on the initial supply of the dices; without investment in the initial dices the game doesnt start, whereas sudoku generation is free.

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#9
post #7
post #2

> The first class lost the students that simply couldn't keep up with the increasingly difficult sudokus. This is the story of every proof-of-work cryptocurrency. After a certain point, they only serve to make the rich even richer. Look at Bitcoin for example, where over 50% of the hashing power is controlled by big Chinese mining operations.

But at the end of the day, PoW is simply a fee that users of the network pay (in the form of inflation) to secure the network. I'm not convinced it's really a distribution mechanism.

Is the network so secure if relatively few groups hold most of the power? The danger of 51% attacks[0] is well known.

[0] https://dci.mit.edu/51-attacks

Re: Children Playing Blockchain

#10
> but without 2 years of constantly solving sudoku under their belt, they couldn't compete with the more experienced sudoku-solvers

Inaccurate analogy. Miners are more limited by cheap electricity/cooling than CPU which is more generally available.

Post reply on HN