Live data from Hacker News

How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

spectrum.ieee.org

31–40 of 95 posts

Re: How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

#31

One thing that I have been wondering, if the atmosphere is so thin, then how does the RTG cool? I seem to have nerd-sniped myself. It needs a temperature differential to generate electric current and it looks to have fins for convective cooling but the atmospheric pressure is a few % of that of sea level Earth.

mars is freezing cold, it's like dust covered ice ball.

Re: How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

#32

Seems shortsighted to end this mission after 30 days. I imagine it's purely for mission planning complexity reasons. But a more sensible approach seems to be to say "after 30 days you have to limit comms to 100 bytes/sec back to earth and stay 100 meters from the rover". In the future I could imagine the more modern processor on the helicopter might become handy... Some neural network based navigation system might ru…

The official mission length is just how long they have to wait before calling it a success. They expect it to last much longer. Since this is primarily a technology demonstrator once it's a "success" more options open up for actually experimenting with tactics and the limits of the device. It's like how you wait until you've left the parking lot to do a big smokey burnout and see how fast a rental goes in 1st gear.

Re: How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

#34
post #31

One thing that I have been wondering, if the atmosphere is so thin, then how does the RTG cool? I seem to have nerd-sniped myself. It needs a temperature differential to generate electric current and it looks to have fins for convective cooling but the atmospheric pressure is a few % of that of sea level Earth.

mars is freezing cold, it's like dust covered ice ball.

But the heat still needs to leak into the environment, and a thin atmosphere means little convection, so it's still just radiation - same problem as in a vacuum.

Re: How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

#35
techpod did an episode recently with the engineering camera payload uplink lead from nasa jpl doug ellison. it was very cool.

from the episode summary:

> "Friend of the podcast Doug Ellison from NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab stops by to give us the lowdown on the newest Mars rover Perseverance, which will be landing on the red planet in just a few weeks, plus all kinds of fun info about Lagrange transceivers, making oxygen out of thin air, flying helicopters on other planets, and recording home movies at mach 25."

https://techpod.content.town/episodes/71-curiosity-and-perse...

Re: How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

#37

Unfortunately the article does not talk about how this helicopter would fare in a sandstorm. Are the winds strong enough to tip it over?

There is practically no wind on Mars. The wind speed is super high, but the air density is so low it won't impact anything more than dust.

This is really interesting to think about. On Venus it’s the opposite. Any kind of wind speed will have a huge impact.

Re: How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

#39
post #17

If you just want images from a different angle, why not tether it to the rover? Also can't you use a kind of balloon instead to save power?

I would think the atmosphere is too light to support a balloon.

I do remember reading about this - a balloon would work, but it would be absolutely enormous, far larger than anything we can bring into Mars currently. Maybe some day.

Re: How NASA Designed a Helicopter That Could Fly Autonomously on Mars

#40

Can someone explain the phyics of flying a helicopter in such low density atmosphere? It must be less efficient than on earth, but evidently efficiency isn't proportional to density or else it could not fly at all.

> It must be less efficient than on earth

No it mustn't. You'd expect efficiency to be higher, all else being equal, since there's less drag to overcome - aircraft can generally fly more efficiently at high altitude on Earth (up to a point). The limiting factor is that helicopter flight only works while the rotor tips are subsonic, so as the air gets thinner the "IAS" that a pitot tube on the rotor (that's going as fast as you safely can) would experience gets lower and lower, and so the flight dynamics will be like a helicopter with a slow rotor, but speeded up. But for a small helicopter the square-cube law is on your side and so a low "IAS" is quite doable.

Post reply on HN