“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
31–40 of 58 posts
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#32It's odd to describe Vint Cerf as Google's Chief Internet Evangelist, a largely honorary and emeritus position, as opposed to co-creator of TCP/IP for which is is famous. It makes the headline and framing feel very click-baity. The referenced FTC announcement was titled "Internet Innovator Vinton G. Cerf to Keynote FTC's Internet of Things Workshop".
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#33[0]: https://twitter.com/vgcerf/status/1244636584508604417?lang=e...
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#34“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
Is there a Firefox extension to fold threads containing that kind of recurring generalities? Sinclair's quote (not even quoted here), "If you are not paying for it, you are the product", "Government are bad", etc. ?
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#35It's odd to describe Vint Cerf as Google's Chief Internet Evangelist, a largely honorary and emeritus position, as opposed to co-creator of TCP/IP for which is is famous. It makes the headline and framing feel very click-baity. The referenced FTC announcement was titled "Internet Innovator Vinton G. Cerf to Keynote FTC's Internet of Things Workshop".
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#36Maybe there should be three terms acknowledged in the study of privacy: Public Obscure Private For the longest time we have interpreted obscurity as privacy. Such as what your house looks like. Or how many people know of your legal immigration status. There are very few pieces of information that are truly private, like social security number, health records (known only by Healthcare providers), and the actions you d…
> There are very few pieces of information that are truly private, like social security number Most countries don't have such a number with such high value.
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#37Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m interested in which jobs you speak of. Surely nobody cares whether or not you have aFB profile when deciding to hire you as a grocery stocker or cashier...
> according to a study by CareerBuilder, nearly 70% of employers screen their candidates using social media and what’s more surprising is 57% of employers are less likely to even contact applicants who lack an online presence [0] [0] https://www.lawdepot.com/blog/should-employers-look-at-socia...
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#39Is there any way to make personal data usage within companies more transparent and verifiable? Are there known studies/works in this line of thought? In an ideal world, what can we do to make data usage more transparent?
Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)
#40This is Vint Cerf, co-creator of TCP/IP (aka the internet protocol). He's better known by his actual name, isn't he?
By technical audiences maybe. By the general public, Verge readers, etc, not so much. Half of the population doesn't know who the vice president is, much less Vint Cerf.