Live data from Hacker News

Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

theverge.com

31–40 of 58 posts

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#31

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

Is there a Firefox extension to fold threads containing that kind of recurring generalities? Sinclair's quote (not even quoted here), "If you are not paying for it, you are the product", "Government are bad", etc. ?

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#32
post #28

It's odd to describe Vint Cerf as Google's Chief Internet Evangelist, a largely honorary and emeritus position, as opposed to co-creator of TCP/IP for which is is famous. It makes the headline and framing feel very click-baity. The referenced FTC announcement was titled "Internet Innovator Vinton G. Cerf to Keynote FTC's Internet of Things Workshop".

More people know what Google is than TCP/IP.

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#34
post #31

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

Is there a Firefox extension to fold threads containing that kind of recurring generalities? Sinclair's quote (not even quoted here), "If you are not paying for it, you are the product", "Government are bad", etc. ?

Add "Chrome is evil, you ought to use Firefox instead" and "I switched from Google to DDG and it's mostly fine, apart from having to use !g as a prefix everytime I search anything on it". Oh and please make it a Chrome addon ;)

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#35
post #28

It's odd to describe Vint Cerf as Google's Chief Internet Evangelist, a largely honorary and emeritus position, as opposed to co-creator of TCP/IP for which is is famous. It makes the headline and framing feel very click-baity. The referenced FTC announcement was titled "Internet Innovator Vinton G. Cerf to Keynote FTC's Internet of Things Workshop".

How is TCP/IP relevant to his opinions on Privacy?

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#36

Maybe there should be three terms acknowledged in the study of privacy: Public Obscure Private For the longest time we have interpreted obscurity as privacy. Such as what your house looks like. Or how many people know of your legal immigration status. There are very few pieces of information that are truly private, like social security number, health records (known only by Healthcare providers), and the actions you d…

> There are very few pieces of information that are truly private, like social security number Most countries don't have such a number with such high value.

How do those countries handle taxes, public services, and credit?

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#38
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m interested in which jobs you speak of. Surely nobody cares whether or not you have aFB profile when deciding to hire you as a grocery stocker or cashier...

> according to a study by CareerBuilder, nearly 70% of employers screen their candidates using social media and what’s more surprising is 57% of employers are less likely to even contact applicants who lack an online presence [0] [0] https://www.lawdepot.com/blog/should-employers-look-at-socia...

"having an online presence" is a much lower bar than "on social media".

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#39

Is there any way to make personal data usage within companies more transparent and verifiable? Are there known studies/works in this line of thought? In an ideal world, what can we do to make data usage more transparent?

How would you guarantee privacy by requiring transparency? They are opposites.

Re: Google's Chief Internet Evangelist: 'privacy may be an anomaly' (2013)

#40
post #21

This is Vint Cerf, co-creator of TCP/IP (aka the internet protocol). He's better known by his actual name, isn't he?

By technical audiences maybe. By the general public, Verge readers, etc, not so much. Half of the population doesn't know who the vice president is, much less Vint Cerf.

We're on Hacker News. I think we can assume audience here is fairly technical.
Post reply on HN