Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

medium.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 50 posts

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#31

Post by amyjess »

privateSFacct wrote: post #27
thedz wrote: post #3

The initial analogy made me cringe, and to be honest, the rest of the post didn't change that impression too much. Reading past the prose and paeans to loyalty, a couple points stick out to me: > "we discovered that the specific charges flagged as fraudulent were not fraudulent charges" "where fulfillment was lagging heavily during the transition which led to some dissatisfied customers who opted to dispute charges"…

No kidding. This guy is so vague about his business. What does he actually make / sell? Socks? Folks with 44% of volume in chargebacks should be shut down! I've found there are always excuses from the scammers, and the whole article is in the mode of I wanted to love stripe but they screwed me. Reality = this guy is screwing his customers over big time! As the author says, it pains me to write this.

I like to call this "Eddie Haskell Syndrome".

After some quick googling, it appears I'm not the only one to use this term.

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#32

Post by privateSFacct »

toomuchtodo wrote: post #25
alexwebb2 wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, if you're selling branded products that you don't actually have available to give to the customer, aren't able to get quickly, and don't even have the legal rights to sell anyway, and then customers start filing chargebacks... that's kind of entirely on you. Also keep in mind that for such a large number of users to go through the trouble of filing the chargebacks, it means that A) it's been long enough that…

There is no requirement for me to have an agreement to sell a branded product (first sale doctrine). If I go buy a cargo container full of North Face gear on clearance, there is nothing North Face can do to stop me from legally selling that gear. Agree with the shipping delay points.

Since most of the cargo containers of north face gear on "clearance" are actually fake product, believe it or not they can absolutely shut you down.

We really need to call out these types of scammers better. Nothing you can do to stop me selling my crap fake "Apple" charges on amazon (amazon should be doing a much better job screening), my "ecommerce store" that is experiencing "fraudulant transactions" == trying to scam users by not shipping anything, too I bought a container of "north face" gear from china and there is nothing you can do to stop me.

In all these cases, the seller had a reasonable ability to think - hey, this is probably a fraud and stop doing what they are doing.

Seriously, for reputation reasons North Face and many other brand retailers do not sell containers of product on "clearance" to rando third party retailers.. Some even destroy amazing amounts of product to avoid to entering into this scammy reseller chain.

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#33

Post by toomuchtodo »

privateSFacct wrote: post #32
toomuchtodo wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no requirement for me to have an agreement to sell a branded product (first sale doctrine). If I go buy a cargo container full of North Face gear on clearance, there is nothing North Face can do to stop me from legally selling that gear. Agree with the shipping delay points.

Since most of the cargo containers of north face gear on "clearance" are actually fake product, believe it or not they can absolutely shut you down. We really need to call out these types of scammers better. Nothing you can do to stop me selling my crap fake "Apple" charges on amazon (amazon should be doing a much better job screening), my "ecommerce store" that is experiencing "fraudulant transactions" == trying to…

You’re moving the goal posts. Counterfeit goods, entirely legal to shut down the sale of. Authentic goods, you cannot. It’s up to the brand to prove they’re not authentic goods being sold and pursue the necessary channels to shut the seller down.

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#34

Post by SyneRyder »

badwolf wrote: post #16
faitswulff wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would count myself in the category of people who don't know exactly how this all works, but this email[0] makes it sound even worse by the end: > We calculate the dispute rate a number of ways, but the two most common are: > 1. The percentage of charges on your account that have been disputed (you are currently 23.74%) > 2. The percentage of volume on your account that has been disputed (you are currently 44.82%) […

These rates are generally dictated by the card companies. We recently had a spike in chargebacks in one of our Stripe accounts, which put us over the warning threshold. Stripe could have handled it a lot better. They withheld payments from us (over 250k) No notifications, or anything else. They waited until we contacted their support on why our payouts weren't processing before they lectured us on how we should be do…

And for others who aren't aware - the standard Visa threshold is 1%. [1] Supposedly with a warning at 0.75% from Visa and at 0.5% from Mastercard.

If you go above that, Visa reserves the option of "potential disqualification from the payment system" [2]. That is, you can be banned from accepting Visa cards ever again.

[1] https://www.braintreepayments.com/blog/changes-to-visa-charg...

[2] (see "Chargeback Compliance Program") https://www.citibank.com.sg/gcb/credit_cards/pdf/Fraud_Charg... [PDF]

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#35

Post by nsp »

owenversteeg wrote: post #11
ajeet_dhaliwal wrote: post #7

I can sympathize because it was just one business unit that he had apparently recently acquired that was responsible for this and the rest of his businesses were ok. The biggest lessons are to be aware of what you are acquiring and the issues they are having, make sure it's very clear to customers how they can contact YOU to get a refund and finally, it's probably a good idea to have separate accounts for different b…

That sounds like the real lesson here: have separate accounts for separate sites. I haven't used Stripe for years, so I'm not sure: is that totally kosher? And if you enter the same business/tax/ID details for two different accounts, will there be any problems? It'd be great to hear from someone about Stripe about this, as I know a lot of Stripe people hang around HN.

My company uses 3 stripe accounts on the advice of our stripe representative, so I believe they’re ok with it.

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#37

Post by metalliqaz »

ajeet_dhaliwal wrote: post #5
bobbytherobot wrote: post #2

The Stripe Christmas Surprise: destroying your competitor's holiday season earnings by issuing a well-placed chargeback.

In all seriousness do they have any way to detect sabotage of this sort?

From the article, it appears they can't even detect obvious fraud, so I'm assuming that the answer is no.

The moral of the story was that Stripes REAL concern was to keep good numbers for their upstream provider. (as an agent/ISO). So... targeted chargebacks probably would have the intended effect.

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#38

Post by privateSFacct »

toomuchtodo wrote: post #33
privateSFacct wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since most of the cargo containers of north face gear on "clearance" are actually fake product, believe it or not they can absolutely shut you down. We really need to call out these types of scammers better. Nothing you can do to stop me selling my crap fake "Apple" charges on amazon (amazon should be doing a much better job screening), my "ecommerce store" that is experiencing "fraudulant transactions" == trying to…

You’re moving the goal posts. Counterfeit goods, entirely legal to shut down the sale of. Authentic goods, you cannot. It’s up to the brand to prove they’re not authentic goods being sold and pursue the necessary channels to shut the seller down.

Says the scammers. You are willfully ignorant here.

Your post did not consider the high likelihood that a container of product on "clearance" from north face is counterfeit.

My point is simple. We have to have less tolerance of the willful ignorance by scammers. The brand should not need to pursue this.

Stipe / Atlas CAN and SHOULD shut down merchants who exhibit characteristics of fraud. Amazon should shut down the fake apple product sellers.

And yes, my job interects with fraud / ripoff detection, and I've worked with folks like you. My advice to folks in business and elsewhere, someone that willfully ignorant is not someone you want to do business with.

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#39

Post by privateSFacct »

owenversteeg wrote: post #11
ajeet_dhaliwal wrote: post #7

I can sympathize because it was just one business unit that he had apparently recently acquired that was responsible for this and the rest of his businesses were ok. The biggest lessons are to be aware of what you are acquiring and the issues they are having, make sure it's very clear to customers how they can contact YOU to get a refund and finally, it's probably a good idea to have separate accounts for different b…

That sounds like the real lesson here: have separate accounts for separate sites. I haven't used Stripe for years, so I'm not sure: is that totally kosher? And if you enter the same business/tax/ID details for two different accounts, will there be any problems? It'd be great to hear from someone about Stripe about this, as I know a lot of Stripe people hang around HN.

I can tell the other replies are from folks running honest businesses!

There is actually another business that leverages it's transaction flow to work with scammers / counterfeit product resellers.

Basically, you buy storefronts at high risk of charge-back or who on their own might have a 10% charge-back rate and can't hold a merchant account. For example, someone sells counterfeit apple chargers. Believe it or not, even though some people might realize it's bogus, maybe only 10% actually charge back. The rest either don't catch on or can't be bothered to charge back. That still is too high. But someone who can mix that in to their own account / high volume account less likely to be shut down - it's a business opportunity.

Exact same issues going on in the ACH space actually which is often used for bogus ongoing / recurring billing.

Re: Stripe Atlas is nothing but a bad marriage

#40

Post by amyjess »

Meekro wrote: post #29

It sounds like he acquired a business that wasn't actually sending out the products that they were charging customers for. What surprises me is that he only discovered this after the chargebacks started coming in. If my company stopped providing the service I was charging for, I would have 3,214 missed calls and 23,512 emails within about 36 minutes. Customers generally don't call their banks until multiple attempts…

Yeah, this has to be a deliberate fraud outlet.

Back in 2009, I ordered a pair of boots for a Halloween costume online. They sent me an email telling me a window when the boots were supposed to ship, and I specifically ordered two-day shipping. Of course, they charged my card right away, which I didn't know at the time was a red flag.

They missed the shipping window. I thought "no big deal, there's a huge holiday coming up, so they're probably just backlogged, I'll wait another day". Another day passed. I sent an email asking what's wrong. No response. No phone number listed on their website, either; that's a red flag. Another day passed. And another. Another email sent. No response. Another day. By this point, it's been about a week after the boots were supposed to arrive, and they haven't even shipped; it's Friday, so I send them an email telling them that if it doesn't ship by Monday, I'm filing a chargeback. No response either.

Right after I sent that last email, I got curious and googled the name of the store. There were pages on Ripoff Report [0], Reseller Ratings [1], and other sites detailing the fact that they just take people's money and never ship anything. I also discovered that they used to have a phone number listed on their site, but they took it off. The BBB had listed them as an F, but it appears that's since been scrubbed from their website.

Well, fuck.

I contacted Chase and filed a chargeback that day. No way am I waiting till Monday now that I know it's a scam. After going into my whole spiel about how they never responded to my emails and I found all this dirt online about them, the person I spoke to just said "Wait, they said it was going to arrive on [date] and it still hasn't shipped?". I said yes, and she immediately approved my chargeback. I was surprised: I was expecting to have to fight them for it.

Also, according to the websites I found, whenever people issued chargebacks against them, they had a habit of running the charge again, sometimes from a different merchant account, again and again and again. People had to report their credit cards as stolen to get it to stop. I watched my statement like a hawk for months, and thankfully it never happened to me, but I just got lucky.

Also, just out of sheer spite, I filed a BBB complaint against them. A few weeks later, the BBB sent me an email telling me they closed my complaint because every attempt to contact the company failed. They didn't answer their phone or respond to any emails or letters.

Reading Viet's post and your comment, I am reminded of that incident. There is no way in hell the business wouldn't have known they weren't shipping product. People don't just issue chargebacks out of the blue. We call and email and do whatever we can to get the damn product into our hands first and only as a last resort do we light the bridge on fire by issuing a chargeback. And I wonder how many people just gave up and never even bothered to issue chargebacks.

[0] https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/specific_search/Queen+F...

[1] https://www.resellerratings.com/store/Queen_Fashions

Post reply on HN