> “Great injury was done after the engine ran up the platform. The brickwork was swept away, and a large portion of a wall was thrown down; in fact, one carriage was thrown completely through the platform wall by the violence with which it was hurled over the line.” > The Era, 26 February 1860. It is amusing to read the writing styles of then with the now. The use of language in the Victorian era was a lot more poeti…
Use of the passive voice gives it a different rhythm. Contemporary "best practice" is to avoid writing in passive voice. What I find interesting is that using active voice for inanimate objects like brickwork and walls and carriages, seems a bit anthropomorphic or perhaps animistic. Sure, "the wall fell" but not by its own volition. Yet, for me the passive voice in this passage bogs down a bit in the final phrasing a…
The Tottenham Station Railway Disaster of 1860
31–35 of 35 posts
Re: The Tottenham Station Railway Disaster of 1860
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK, so what about point b - by prioritising children expressing their individuality we are actually limiting their ability to express themselves with eloquence?
I didn't really want to get into an argument about education but since you asked: honestly, I see no evidence to support your point. My wife is a primary school teacher and most of my extended family currently work or have worked in schools. Not one person I've spoken to has ever talked about kids being treated even remotely in the fashion you describe. I am sure you could find some specific examples which support yo…
Cheers!
Edit: oh, he's actually 18. Come back round here in 10 years when you've had kids of your own (not that you ever will if you keep frequenting these parts. Go outside)
Re: The Tottenham Station Railway Disaster of 1860
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't really want to get into an argument about education but since you asked: honestly, I see no evidence to support your point. My wife is a primary school teacher and most of my extended family currently work or have worked in schools. Not one person I've spoken to has ever talked about kids being treated even remotely in the fashion you describe. I am sure you could find some specific examples which support yo…
Always a joy to watch some random idiot on the internet destroyed by someone who knows what they're talking about. Cheers! Edit: oh, he's actually 18. Come back round here in 10 years when you've had kids of your own (not that you ever will if you keep frequenting these parts. Go outside)
Re: The Tottenham Station Railway Disaster of 1860
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK, so what about point b - by prioritising children expressing their individuality we are actually limiting their ability to express themselves with eloquence?
I didn't really want to get into an argument about education but since you asked: honestly, I see no evidence to support your point. My wife is a primary school teacher and most of my extended family currently work or have worked in schools. Not one person I've spoken to has ever talked about kids being treated even remotely in the fashion you describe. I am sure you could find some specific examples which support yo…
I'll just leave thus here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2815147/Why-trendy-t...
Re: The Tottenham Station Railway Disaster of 1860
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't really want to get into an argument about education but since you asked: honestly, I see no evidence to support your point. My wife is a primary school teacher and most of my extended family currently work or have worked in schools. Not one person I've spoken to has ever talked about kids being treated even remotely in the fashion you describe. I am sure you could find some specific examples which support yo…
Perhaps it doesn't fit your political viewpoint. Teaching is notoriously left wing. I know teachers myself, and they have told me that education has changed in the way I have described. I'll just leave thus here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2815147/Why-trendy-t...
But it is pretty clear your stance on this is pretty far right so anything is going to seem too left wing for your liking. Case in point: you read the Daily Mail and Christian publications and take them at face value. If the issues were are prevalent as you pretend then you wouldn't be scraping the barrel with 5 year old reports in papers that have a terrible reputation for inaccuracies.
Anyhow, I said before that I didn't really want to get drawn into a debate about education - I have to endure enough ranting about it from my wife each night - so this is the last I'm going to say on the subject.