Live data from Hacker News

Wine 2.0 released

winehq.org

31–40 of 314 posts

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#31
post #8
post #3

Any hope of playing Overwatch with this?

AppDB is the canonical resource for this kind of question: https://appdb.winehq.org/ -> Returns https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=applicatio... , which says it's currently classified "Garbage" as of 2.0-rc2.

BTW if you find you need multiple versions of Wine for better compatibility with different apps (and probably even if you don't), PlayOnLinux is also a great tool.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#32

Cool. I have to admit I haven't thought about Wine in a while because I can't think of any software I use that doesn't have a Linux version. What are people's use-cases nowadays?

iTunes, OCRing PDFs.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#33

> The main highlights are the support for Microsoft Office 2013, and the 64-bit support on macOS. This made me chuckle. Better late than never I suppose.

A volunteer reverse engineering project being only 3 years behind a gigantic corporation is actually pretty impressive.

Very much so but there are some commercial companies that have been contributing to the project as well.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#34

Cool. I have to admit I haven't thought about Wine in a while because I can't think of any software I use that doesn't have a Linux version. What are people's use-cases nowadays?

Tag&Rename [1], a still maintained Windows-only shareware excellent at tagging music. Occasional use, Linux equivalents suck in various ways, it's perfectly configured to my needs, and works perfectly in Wine so why change it :) [1] http://www.softpointer.com/tr.htm EDIT: thanks for the Linux alternative suggestions everyone! I have (had) mostly the same complaints about ExFalso / Puddletag / EasyTAG as the ones I po…

What are the shortcomings you find in Picard?

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#36
post #26

This brings me back to the early days of my Linux usage. I've always been fascinated by this project. My very nerdy dream has always been to try to contribute to it somehow. How hard is it to get in to the community?

Another non development way to contribute is on the appdb, testing compatibility -

https://appdb.winehq.org/

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#37

> The main highlights are the support for Microsoft Office 2013, and the 64-bit support on macOS. This made me chuckle. Better late than never I suppose.

I havent used office in a many years now.. but I thought MS Office is now an online offering similar to Google Docs?

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much of a performance hit have you seen when running games, compared to just running them in Windows on the same machine?

Depends on the game. Some run better on Windows, some on Wine. You need to check for specific titles with this kind of question. I've seen multiple sources claiming that CoD2 and WoW run with better FPS on Wine for example.

Wow, I never would have thought they could run better. I'm thinking of old titles, AoE II, Starcraft, etc. They have good ratings but I'm just wondering if it would be anywhere near as bad as when I used to run VMWare on my old Mac.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much of a performance hit have you seen when running games, compared to just running them in Windows on the same machine?

In most cases, I can't notice a difference in performance.

Great to hear, thanks. I'll have to try out Wine soon.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#40

Cool. I have to admit I haven't thought about Wine in a while because I can't think of any software I use that doesn't have a Linux version. What are people's use-cases nowadays?

Old games for instance :) I love this game from the late 90s called Thief: the dark project from Looking Glass Studios. I don't think there is any way to run it properly on a modern computer without wine or virtualization (which would require a copy of Windows 98).
Post reply on HN