The guy looks like a fraud to me.
The employees should be accountable to the management, and the management in turn should be accountable to the board which in turn they should be accountable to shareholders and believe it or not the General Assembly of shareholders can push for a vote of no confidence for the management and kick them out and elect a new board.
That's how accountability, transparency and good corporate governance work. If you see any reluctance, hesitation, or outright objections from management, that's a sign that there's something wrong with them and they're hiding something.
Also, his anti-shareholder rhetoric could jeopardize his mission as a CEO of the corporations he presides over as it would limit his option of raising capital on the open market esp in times of need because if you treat your shareholders like that and someday you that you need to finance a new project by tapping the equity market through issuing new shares, rest assured the existing shareholders will make you pay for every bad word you said about them while potential ones would be very skeptical of your intentions and ability to deliver due to your awful politics.