Live data from Hacker News

France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

lemonde.fr

291–300 of 571 posts

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#291
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do these work? I would think radar would have a very difficult time seeing a ship against the backdrop of the ocean from so high above. Is the satellite bouncing radar waves off the side of the ship as the satellite is near the horizon? Even if you can detect a ship, I'm having a hard time imagining a sufficiently high radar resolution for such a wide sensor swath width at such an extreme range. Is the idea that…

SAR operates in side-looking slant geometry. Consider shooting a ray at the ocean at an oblique angle from a satellite: it bounces off and scatters away from you. Hardly any of the energy scatters back towards you. Now, put a ship there. The ray bounces off the surface of the ocean and scatters up into the side of the ship, and from geometry, it's going to bounce off the ship and come straight back towards its origin…

>A ship on the ocean is basically a dihedral corner reflector, which is a very good target for a radar.

This is why the Zumwalt and other low observable designs are going back to roughly tumblehome hulls:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zumwalt-class_destroyer#/media...

If only it could actually do anything. I genuinely don't understand how we refused to retrofit any weapon system to the gun mounts. We have 5inch guns. They aren't the magic cannon it was designed for but do they really not fit? Apparently we are now putting hypersonic missiles in those mounts instead.

Can't exactly make a Carrier that shape though.

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#293
post #243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it's actually very hard to find a ship, even as large as an aircraft carrier, in the ocean I just ran some googled numbers over my envelope, and I get that the Mediterranean sea (great circle distance between Gibraltar and Beirut is 2300mi) is about 14000x larger than the bow-to-stern length (858') of the carrier. That's... not that terribly difficult as an imaging problem. Just a very tractable number of well-reso…

And you've defined a harder problem! Once you've found it once it's much easier to find in the future: it can only go so fast, and it's constrained to stay in relatively deep water.

to be fair "relatively deep water" is 99% of seas and oceans...

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You would only need to find it once, potentially at a port, and then you can follow it.

This capability is available only to few countries on planet. Not all of them.

[dead]

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#295
post #77

I seriously doubt there is a country on earth which lacks the capability to detect an aircraft carrier's presence in the Mediterranean sea. We are not talking about stealth vehicles.

We couldn’t find a commercial jet (MH370). Both, while it was still flying in the air and after it was presumably lost in the ocean. They couldn’t track it in the air nor can they still find its remains after looking for it for so long. This problem is not trivial.

Surprisingly, it is much easier to find a big chunk of steel floating on the Mediterranean, knowing where it was a couple of days ago, than a smaller object disintegrated in small pieces under the Indian Ocean. Go figure.

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I certainly hope so, but we've pretty much hung Ukraine out to dry under Trump [1], just like we did the Iranian protesters. Unlike Russia, Ukraine evidently doesn't have any kompromat on Trump or the Republican Party in general. 1: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/us-military-aid-ukraine-...

> I certainly hope so Then you probably should accept that proxy wars work both ways. And well, it's not really Iran's fault that its borders has crept so close to the US military bases.

Who is Iran a proxy for? Russia, as usual, has only benefited from Trump's actions.

The one thing you can say about Iran is that they were absolute morons not to actually build or otherwise acquire a nuclear arsenal. They had decades. If Pakistan could do it...

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#297
post #128
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mediterranean maybe (although I'm not sure), but it's actually very hard to find a ship, even as large as an aircraft carrier, in the ocean. The empty space is just too big. Satellites have hard time taking pictures of every square mile of a sea to find any ship, yet alone the one you need.

I really don’t want to work for the defense industry, but I have to admit that they do have very fun problems to solve. You know there are people at NRO who are dedicated to ship tracking via satellite. I assume they can easily track ships without cloud cover, but how do they do it when it’s cloudy? Heat signatures? Synthetic Aperture Radar? Wake detection?

when it's cloudy, heat signatures won't help, infrared is blocked by clouds

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish defense paid better. The problems are infinitely more interesting than ads. And it’s not like social media is a saint anyway.

Hmmm on the one hand murder, on the other hand ads

It would be fine if "defense" is what was meant, but they recently changed it back to a far more honest "department of war".

Re: France's aircraft carrier located in real time by Le Monde through fitness app

#300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MH370 crashed in the Pacific. Look at the globe some day from that angle and compare it to the Mediterranean.

Err, no. The consensus and available evidence including washed up components seems to be that it crashed in the Indian Ocean, that's the (also vast) space between ~Australia and ~Africa, bounded in the north by Indonesia, the Indian subcontinent, and Arabia. It crashed somewhere in the eastern portion, not far from Indonesia and Australia. Currents then took parts as far as the Maldives/Sri Lanka, IIRC. The Pacific i…

> Currents then took parts as far as the Maldives/Sri Lanka, IIRC

Some bits ended up on a beach of the Réunion island, closer to Madagascar than Sri Lanka. I am not disagreeing, it’s just that the whole story is fascinating. It’s easy to think "well, it just crashed into the sea so of course some bits would show up on a beach" until you look at the Indian Ocean with a proper projection and figure the scale.

Post reply on HN