After having spent a few days with OpenClaw I have to say it’s about the worst software I’ve worked with ever. Everyone focused on the security flaws but the software itself is barely coherent. It’s like Moltbook wrote OpenClaw wrote Moltbook in some insidious wiggum loop from hell with no guard rails. The commit rate on the project reflects this.
OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
291–300 of 440 posts
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#292> I suspect ten years from now, people will look back at 2024-2025 as the moment Apple had a clear shot at owning the agent layer and chose not to take it Ten years from now, there will be no ‘agent layer’. This is like predicting Microsoft failed to capitalize on bulletin boards social media.
Ten years from now, the agent layer will be the interface the majority of people use a computer through. Operating systems will become more agentic and absorb the application layer while platforms like Claude Cowork will try to become the omniapp. They’ll meet in the middle and it will be like Microsoft trying to fight Netscape’s view of the web as the omniapp all over again. Apple will either capitalise on this by m…
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ten years from now, the agent layer will be the interface the majority of people use a computer through. Operating systems will become more agentic and absorb the application layer while platforms like Claude Cowork will try to become the omniapp. They’ll meet in the middle and it will be like Microsoft trying to fight Netscape’s view of the web as the omniapp all over again. Apple will either capitalise on this by m…
I think you are right. In fact, if were a regular office worker today, a Claude subscription could possibly be the only piece of software you might need to open for days in a row to be productive. You can check messages, send messages, modify documents, create documents, do research, and so on. You could even have it check on news and forums for you (if they could be crawled that is).
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
Regardless of how Apple will solve this, please just solve it. Siri is borderline useless these days. > Will it rain today? Please unlock your iphone for that > Any new messages from Chris? You will need to unlock your iphone for that > Please play youtube music Playing youtube music... please open youtube music app to do that All settings and permission granted. Utterly painful.
Do you want people being able to command your phone without unblocking? Maybe what you want is to disable phone blocking all together
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#295> This is exactly what Apple Intelligence should have been... They could have shipped an agentic AI that actually automated your computer instead of summarizing your notifications. Imagine if Siri could genuinely file your taxes, respond to emails, or manage your calendar by actually using your apps, not through some brittle API layer that breaks every update. And this is probably coming, a few years from now. Becaus…
> Because remember, Apple doesn't usually invent new products. It takes proven ones and then makes its own much nicer version. Funny seeing this repeated again in response to Siri which is just... not very good.
.
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#296According to https://1password.com/blog/from-magic-to-malware-how-opencla... , The top skill is/was malware. It's obviously broken, so no, Apple Intelligence should not have been this.
I feel like I’m watching group psychosis where people are just following each other off a cliff. I think the promise of AI and the potential money involved override all self preservation instincts in some people. It would be fine if I could just ignore it, but they are infecting the entire industry.
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
Considering there are 1.5M openclaw agents, created by 17,000 humans, it seems like some people really would use more than 1.
if you are counting reported moltbook accounts there are not, the API was spammed by scripts to create accounts
https://www.wiz.io/blog/exposed-moltbook-database-reveals-mi...
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you’re heavily invested in Apple apps (iMessage/Calendar/Reminders/Notes), you need a Mac to give the agent tools to interact with these apps. I think that combined with the form factor, price, and power consumption, makes it an ideal candidate. If you’re heavily invested in Windows, then you’d probably go for a small x86 PC.
Can you imagine giving an AI access to your messages, notes and calendar though? I use agentic coding, this is next level madness.
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#299Why are people needing the Mac Minis? Isn’t OpenClaw supposed to run locally in your laptop?
And if it actually should run as a service, why a MacMini and not some docker on the local NAS for instance?