Earlier quoted context omitted.
The good news is that the Netherlands has come a long way too. It used to be far more car-centric, but over the years has steadily made improvements as part of ongoing maintenance. And now we're at the point where we're even re-digging canals that had been paved over for a 12-lane motorway [1] in the 70s. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/14/utrecht-restor...
That road was a failed experiment. There's no parking space in the center. there aren't any big access roads towards it. There was little logic supporting a broad, short road to nowhere.
The Stroad
281–290 of 351 posts
Re: The Stroad
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a great channel that puts words to just why American cities are so dystopic. It really helps understand exactly what "induced demand" means. If you add another lane, some of the people on the bus will take the car, and thus the new lane is almost immediately full again. If you remove the bus lane, bike lane, sidewalk, same thing. Adding capacity for cars actually makes travelling by car worse . It also gives hop…
Induced demand is nonsense. If people leave the bus to drive it indicates your bus system is providing bad service. If more people drive it indicates that your city isn't filling its purpose as being a place where there are a lot of things to do. Cities need to figure out how to get ahead of induced demand not how use it as an excuse to be a worse city.. sure, this is a hard problem, with many options that make somet…
Re: The Stroad
#283About Here (Specific to Vancouver, BC): https://www.youtube.com/c/AboutHere
Oh the Urbanity: https://www.youtube.com/c/OhTheUrbanity
City Beautiful: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityBeautiful
Re: The Stroad
#284Not Just Bikes has a good video about this, if you can get over the smugness ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzNZUeUHAM
Re: The Stroad
#285Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have it completely backwards. Suburbs aren't scalable. That's why back in the 50s-70s when they were first built, they were amazing, but today, they are rife with traffic problems, noise pollution, and crumbling infrastructure.
The percentage of the population living in the suburbs is growing, not shrinking.
Notice how the second statement doesn't disprove the first.
Re: The Stroad
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it's the suburbs that lack economy of scale. The walkable areas contribute far more per acre in taxes than the suburbs. They also require fewer resources to maintain per person because they're physically smaller. The suburbs have such a paucity of "economies of scale" that municipalities around the country have gone into debt to support them. The reason donuts cost more at your local walkable place is because rea…
>No, it's the suburbs that lack economy of scale. The walkable areas contribute far more per acre in taxes than the suburbs. They also require fewer resources to maintain per person because they're physically smaller. The suburbs have such a paucity of "economies of scale" that municipalities around the country have gone into debt to support them. Yes, Strong towns loves to say this too despite it being obviously not…
Re: The Stroad
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's mostly a case of people not knowing what they really want. Demand-driven economy has a place, but it's definitely not something to accept simplistically. Famous examples: people wanted better horse-carriages and didn't anticipate cars. People wanted better keyboards on their blackberry-style phones, not an iPhone. Etc etc. Nobody who experiences life in the Netherlands where biking and walking is actually safe e…
I'm not convinced. It's not like your "better horse-carriage" example because the option already exists and people reject it. My colleagues in the Bay Area all lived in SF, then quickly moved to the subrurbs when they got older. Sure, there is no pedestrian/biking utopia in the US, but there are places where you can pretty much get by without a car. And many people don't choose to live there. I also spent some time i…
Agree. I don't understand the claims in this discussion about kids not being able to get around in suburbs on their own. I lived part of my childhood in a dense metropolis and part in a suburb. I was able to get around the suburb just fine on my own on a bicycle. This was before bike lanes (which many suburbs now have), and I would just ride on the sidewalk - this is perfectly safe and legal.
> And when I talked to my colleagues you know what their desired was? Make enough money to buy a car and get the equivalent of a single family home.
This isn't surprising to me, particularly if people know what the two different lifestyles are like (with and without a car). I am more of an advocate for different cities to have different styles of living for different people. The big issue in discussions like this, is a belief that there must be only one way to do things, and it must be forced onto every town and city through aggressive activism, which people who are older or have children or other responsibilities just don't have time to combat. That's not just disruptive but also unethical, in my opinion.
This thread also has several people with a fetishistic obsession with life in the Netherlands. Granted - the Not Just Bikes channel that many have mentioned is run by someone who moved to NL - so the bias there is expected. But lots of people who fantasize about NL would not actually like living there. To be blunt about it, most of the Dutch cities are soulless and boring. At first the immediate walk-out-the-door access to local businesses/destinations was charming. But ultimately I felt that the anti-car lifestyle led to a cultural lack of spontaneity and people implicitly had committed to a limited life that is centered around just what is nearby. Ironically, unlike the GP, I felt those living in NL who reported high levels of happiness were the ones who didn't know there were other options.
Re: The Stroad
#288I've been a fan of "strong towns" for a while. I was wondering if anyone in the know here could answer: has it made much difference?
For example, there's lot of housing developers out there that build "eco-villages" housing developments -- the houses have solar or are well-insulated or there's a community garden or something else cute like that.
But a real "eco village" isn't a housing development with a gate or two onto the local stroad, it's a walkable/bikable/mixed-development town where you don't need a car to go grab a cup of coffee. Outside of the old pre-car suburbs like Cambridge/Somerville, are there any towns that are actively all-in on these ideas?
Re: The Stroad
#289Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately the majority of people don't seem to understand they're not allowed to pass on the right (and they never get pulled over for it).
If slower traffic kept right, there’d be a lot less passing on the right. (If you’re getting passed on the right regularly, you might consider your own lane discipline as well as that of those passing you.)
Re: The Stroad
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it's the suburbs that lack economy of scale. The walkable areas contribute far more per acre in taxes than the suburbs. They also require fewer resources to maintain per person because they're physically smaller. The suburbs have such a paucity of "economies of scale" that municipalities around the country have gone into debt to support them. The reason donuts cost more at your local walkable place is because rea…
Plus the Dunkin Donuts was gifted expensive public infrastructure since, in all likelihood, they have a 10 year tax incentive that prevents them from paying almost any property taxes.