Earlier quoted context omitted.
> and has MORE customer satisfaction than Android phones. Something which is yet to translate into phones sold. > Did you even read the article I linked? Sure. There is only a handful of WP7 devices out there and they are all very high-end. Android phones cover a much broader spectrum - there are low-end Android phones - and the number of disappointed users is going to be much higher. From TFA: "The data might be ske…
I meant the Businessweek article, not the ZDNet one. >Something which is yet to translate into phones sold. That doesn't still warrant the 'phone OS that no one wants'. >And we can see the difference now that Nokia is selling devices running WP7. They announced the deal in Feb and they're going to release devices in Sep/Oct, is that not fast enough for a huge company like Nokia and with phone hardware that takes year…
And that's why I wouldn't suggest going with it. The fact remains, however, that the transition from MeeGo to Android would be much easier and that Nokia would have a competitive Android phone (and a very good one) now instead of a WP7 phone in September or October.
> You think you know more than them and that they're all fools?
No. I don't think Elop is an idiot. Obviously, he is doing what his board perceives as the most profitable thing to do. What I don't think is that it will lead to Nokia making great phones as this is not a precondition to making a profit and Nokia has demonstrated, over and over again, this wouldn't be the safest bet.