Live data from Hacker News

U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

e360.yale.edu

271–280 of 540 posts

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I choose to blame the people that actually voted for this. Fuck those people.

Agree on cause, disagree on solution.

I'd lean more towards education than fornication.

No judgement.

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wouldn't assume that this is about cost cutting. If the goal were saving money, the cheapest option by far would be to leave the hardware in the water and just stop funding the monitoring. Instead the plan is an expensive operation to send ships out to extract 900+ instruments from under two miles of ocean. It's clear that this is driven by performative climate denialism and a pro fossil fuel stance. The Trump admi…

The crazy thing is that the oil companies confessed to a misinformation campaign and at least publicly talked about change/reform (of course, they're still oil exploration/refinement companies so not abandoning that). But they did discuss responsible use of fossil fuels in transition towards renewables. But Trump was fooled and is more committed than ever to the since-abandoned misinformation campaign. It took on a b…

The Mauna Loa CO2 data is still up.[1] Trump tried to kill off the CO2 measuring, but that doesn't seem to have happened. The Mauna Loa data goes back to 1958, measured at the same point, far from any CO2 sources. 315ppm in 1958, 441ppm today, and almost a noise free curve with mild seasonal variations. Clearest trend in global warming.

[1] https://gml.noaa.gov/webdata/ccgg/trends/co2/co2_mm_mlo.txt

[2] https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/01/climate/trump-cuts-mauna-loa-...

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does the F35 do that? Wasn't Iran shooting those down recently? If there's anything Iran has taught us it's that airpower doesn't win wars, allies do. The US will leave the middle east with their tail between their legs. This is the beginning of the end of the American Empire. For the privilege of spending enormous sums of treasure flying around dropping bombs on brown people what did we get? I would have rather seen…

I'm sorry, but this is like the most ignorant take ever. The world is essentially one life supported regime away from having a level of stability in the middle east that has quite literally never been achieved. Iran and their regional proxies have been almost the only source of middle eastern discontent in the last two decades. The stability of the region is already vastly improved from any time in the past and the d…

Okay so Iran is responsible for the insurgency in Iraq, the Arab Spring, AQAP in Yemen, Islamic State, the ongoing situation in Syria, proxy wars between Saudi Arabia and the UAE and much more…

I think it’s extremely clear that the major contributor to instability in the Middle East over the past two decades has been the United States.

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

‘If we stop testing right now, we’d have very few cases, if any’ - Trump on COVID19

[flagged]

Sure, I'll grow up and listen to riffs about how inhaling bleach fumes "gets in the lungs and does a tremendous number" or being exposed to a "very powerful light" are thought by same man above as a potential remedy for same disease with 100% seriousness.

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#276
post #110

10 years from now: Climate Activist: The oceans are getting warmer & global currents are threatened by imminent collapse - we must do something! Big Oil: Prove it! Climate Activist: Data gathered between 2016 and 2026 shows ... Big Oil: That's old news! Do you have more recent data? Climate Activist: Well, no, because Trump2 dismantled the ocean observation system in 2026 ... Big Oil: So you have no data to back up y…

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#277
post #110

10 years from now: Climate Activist: The oceans are getting warmer & global currents are threatened by imminent collapse - we must do something! Big Oil: Prove it! Climate Activist: Data gathered between 2016 and 2026 shows ... Big Oil: That's old news! Do you have more recent data? Climate Activist: Well, no, because Trump2 dismantled the ocean observation system in 2026 ... Big Oil: So you have no data to back up y…

[flagged]

That doesn't happen overnight, or in time for the program to not be dismantled.

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#278
post #75

What really puts all of this into perspective for me is I work in academia and one of my friends works for a defense contractor. He told me the maintenance cost per flight hour of F-35 was a bit more than $40k, which is significantly more than I make in a year as a grad student. It's crazy basic science is what's been the focus of so many cuts while it's so cheap.

How many million graduate students do you need to give the US the military hegemony and political influence over allies and adversaries that the F-35 program provides ? Looked at from a policy maker's viewpoint, things look very different.

> How many million graduate students do you need to give the US the military hegemony and political influence over allies and adversaries that the F-35 program provides ?

All good questions 3 years ago. How many would rely on US weapons or their US relationship today?

And then there is the unimpressive show in the Middle East.

Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse

#280

I'm asking in good faith here. If it's so critical, then why couldn't the same data be collected and published by another sovereign nation?

I'm guessing you need permission to go deploy a bunch of buoys off the coast of Oregon, and that permission may be difficult to obtain for foreign research projects in the current US political climate.

I think you may have a hard time monitoring the Atlantic current if your sensors are all deployed off the coast of Oregon so it seems to me that this administration would jump at the opportunity to deploy those sensors off of the Oregon coast. Then they could tell the people that they are carefully monitoring the situation and can't find a problem. Nothing to see here, literally.
Post reply on HN