Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

theguardian.com

271–280 of 590 posts

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#271
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He won’t continue working after this year, like you said. Microsoft can’t magically make his equity disappear.

I think the problem is the optics of allowing him to continue working a single day after Microsoft takes over. It sends a message that it's okay.

People at that level have complicated employment contracts. Getting rid of them without huge downsides isn't always straightforward.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I do suspect that Microsoft may have been behind Starfield releasing in its half-baked, dumbed down state though a la “We need it on game pass by X, make it happen!” In fairness to Microsoft, "half-baked" would be how I describe all of Bethesda's previous releases as well. I don't think Starfield is that far off how Skyrim or Fallout 4 was on release. Starfield's a long shot from where Skyrim and Fallout are now af…

> In fairness to Microsoft, "half-baked" would be how I describe all of Bethesda's previous releases as well. I don't think Starfield is that far off how Skyrim or Fallout 4 was on release. Starfield's a long shot from where Skyrim and Fallout are now after years of patches and DLC, but I think not far from where they started. I've got friends that go deep into Bethesda releases on launch and they all agree that Star…

It's seems to be better from a bug perspective, but it's still the same shallow experience. Which is now even more noticeable in 2023.

I sincerely hope that MS will put a lot of time in to make the next elder scrolls good, but my money is on another flop.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#273
People are so excited for cloud gaming, and Xbox Game Pass growing now... The price will continue to go up up up up up up. I remember when YouTube TV was $35/mo now it's $73/mo. Game Pass and all cloud gaming will slowly cost more until it's close to 1/2 the price a month of a game, and slowly creep up from there. Sad.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pentiment is a masterpiece.

It also never would have been released without gamepass, so we have some evidence that Microsoft acquisitions don't all end terribly

Obsidian has said in interviews that Grounded was also the sort of game that they would pitch and pitch for years and get rejection after rejection and probably wouldn't have happened without Game Pass. No one wanted a "co-op shooter with tower defense elements" from "an RPG company", especially with such a wild setting/theme, but Game Pass let them experiment and play so long as they made some "live service" concessions to get people to dip in/out over multiple months of Game Pass.

Obsidian seems to be thriving under Microsoft, doing all sorts of crazy things that their previous history hinted at that they were capable of but never had the resources or the publisher buy-in to explore. It's fascinating to watch so far. I'm curious to see what they do with the bigger budgets of Avowed and Outer Worlds 2.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#276
post #28

We likely won't see any real effects of this until the next generation of consoles, but I think in 3-4 years it is going to be very interesting to see what happens with gaming. Putting Nintendo aside since they really don't compete, they are kinda just in their own "Nintendo" space and that isn't a bad thing. But Sony having some real competition is a good thing. Sony has a bad tendency of anti-consumer tendencies in…

> But Sony having some real competition is a good thing. Sony has a bad tendency of anti-consumer tendencies in their gaming space when they are the leader and they get cocky. They did it with the PS3 and they are repeating some of that with the PS5 generation.

PS5 is widely regarded as the best playstation experience since the PS2.

Great backwards compatibility and third-party support.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#277
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mostly its because Activision/Blizzard is such an obviously shitty terrible company that any deal that sees cool IPs taken out of their hands is seen as a positive thing.

Which games has MS shown good stewardship of? Halo is a shell of what it once was and has snubbed the players with false promises in recent iterations (couch co-op used to be a staple of Halo but they reneged on their promise to include it with the latest). AFAIK they haven't had any good exclusive IP for Xbox in a while. They've had a few dynamite hits (ex. Sunset Overdrive) but haven't followed up on any that I'm a…

Sunset Overdrive was a single game publishing contract with Insomniac Games best known for its Sony second party games and now entirely owned by Sony since 2019 (just after Sunset Overdrive). Microsoft can't follow up on Sunset Overdrive.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#278

Normally I'm against such huge mergers - but Activision Blizzard is one of the most hostile companies against their users and employees I have ever seen. I can't imagine this being a bad thing for game fans.

Yes, giving monopolies more power has historically been good for consumers

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#279

God damn man. How is this not an antitrust violation? The only answer is that we live in truly corrupt times. What is our answer to this?

Because it really isn't a violation of antitrust as is currently defined. Linda Khan's article here is, IMO, one of the best overviews of why: https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/amazons-antitrust-parado... What's frustrating is that this requires legislative change, which, given the current political climate, seems like a sisyphean task.

We'll just keep rolling through the 21st century with horribly outdated laws on every front, because the government can't function well enough to change them

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#280
post #214

UK regulators were objecting the deal because they were concerned that the takeover would reduce competition in cloud gaming. Microsoft gave game streaming rights to Ubisoft, which made the Activision deal possible: https://techcrunch.com/2023/10/13/why-microsoft-had-to-relin... "For Ubisoft, this deal means it has full and exclusive cloud-streaming rights to all current commercially available Activision games, as we…

well, assuming there's actually a cloud gaming market. A fact that's still up for debate I think.

I think the fact Steam / Valve has not jumped into that bandwagon speaks for itself. Its fine when Microsoft does like Xbox Game Pass because they have nothing to lose with it, and they gain people who may want to own some of those games, or who want it for the Microsoft games on the subscription.
Post reply on HN