Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

theguardian.com

101–110 of 590 posts

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the problem is the optics of allowing him to continue working a single day after Microsoft takes over. It sends a message that it's okay.

The problem was allowing him to keep his job and walk away with a bonus check. This guy should have walked away with nothing instead.

That isn’t how equity works

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the problem is the optics of allowing him to continue working a single day after Microsoft takes over. It sends a message that it's okay.

The problem was allowing him to keep his job and walk away with a bonus check. This guy should have walked away with nothing instead.

Well as much as I agree with you I'm sure the legal part of it was looked at with a microscope.

It would have been nice if Microsoft gave him incentive to ride off into the sunset immediately as much as he doesn't deserve it.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#103

And what is Microsoft going to do with this purchase? Seriously, Microsoft is buy all these game studios and fail to utilize them probably. They own all the IP required to do a followup to Fallout New Vegas and NOTHING.

Microsoft will likely just let them keep operating as they do now, providing money and reaping any profits. They'll only step in directly if the studios are having problems they can't handle themselves, or performing very poorly. They want the profit, not as much to direct everything on a micro-level. EDIT: They will of course make more titles Windows/XBox exclusive too, which makes sense considering the investment.

No they want to buy a monopoly since they couldn’t earn one.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#104

God damn man. How is this not an antitrust violation? The only answer is that we live in truly corrupt times. What is our answer to this?

Microsoft doesn't have anything close to a monopoly on games. In terms of sales and reviewer scores, most of the top games weren't produced by Activision or other Microsoft studios. The only recent release I'm aware of was Starfield, and that was panned for failing to meet expectations, achieving under 88 on Metacritic.

How is buying up two of the biggest game studios not anti-competitive behavior? The apologism in this comment is hilarious. I hope your getting paid for shilling this hard.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft will likely just let them keep operating as they do now, providing money and reaping any profits. They'll only step in directly if the studios are having problems they can't handle themselves, or performing very poorly. They want the profit, not as much to direct everything on a micro-level. EDIT: They will of course make more titles Windows/XBox exclusive too, which makes sense considering the investment.

Until enshittification. And then they’ll be hollowed out.

Very unlikely. Again, MS just wants the profits. If a studio is doing well, they don't want to touch it. They want a steady revenue stream.

They'll only step in if the studio is floundering and their couple releases have been flops. Then they'll offer direction, and shut them down if they can't fix it.

That's what we've seen from MS so far, and it makes the most sense from their perspective.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#106

God damn man. How is this not an antitrust violation? The only answer is that we live in truly corrupt times. What is our answer to this?

I’m convinced we’ve always had corruption, it’s just seeing more of the light today. I mention this to my Eastern European friends and they laugh at the level of corruption the US complains about (compared to what they’ve had for decades+)

But that's a big part of why the US is as successful as it is. A culture against corruption. It's very hard to get rid of it once it entrenches itself, which is why people complain about it.

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Bobby Kotick threatened to have his former assistant killed [0] Activision CEO Bobby Kotick Knew for Years About Sexual-Misconduct Allegations at Videogame Giant [1] Activision's Bobby Kotick Didn't Just Know, He Also Was Shitty To Women [2] Activision Blizzard CEO Brushes Off Company’s Harassment Issues—Argues There Is No ‘Systemic’ Problem [3] [0] https://www.businessinsider.com/activision-ceo-bobby-kotick-... [1]…

[deleted]

Re: Microsoft completes $69B deal to buy Activision Blizzard

#110

Bobby Kotick will remain as CEO until the end of 2023 and get a huge check for this purchase. He's getting rewarded for building a toxic, fratboy workspace, sexually and psycologically harassing women. I wonder if Microsoft can be held accountable for allowing a sex predator like him to continue working.

He's being rewarded for growing net income roughly a hundred fold between 2010 and now. I think it's fair that he gets a huge chunk of the value he's created for investors.

There is no concept of “fair”. It is just what he and the board ended up negotiating.
Post reply on HN