Wall Street Journal (except the op-ed pages, which are comically extreme). Financial Times is also very good, I prefer WSJ. They provide actual reporting and not just narrative; WSJ reporting broke the news of the Theranos fraud for example.
Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
271–280 of 320 posts
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
the gell-mann effect
What he described is literally the opposite of Gell-Mann Amnesia, which is the phenomenon where such a reader will forget about all of the inaccuracies he noticed in the article on which he was an expert and continue believing other articles to be accurate.
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Literally, every year old people die because of cold weather and not being able to afford the proper heating. Yes, but the problem is not explaining that people aren't dying because of the cold itself. The way you wrote this and the way the media portrays the problem makes it sound like people will die from freezing to death, which is just not true. Pretty much all reporting forgets to add the nuance that deaths in…
> The way you wrote this and the way the media portrays the problem makes it sound like people will die from freezing to death, which is just not true. This is true. Old people freeze to death every year.
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#274Could you give examples of how quality has declined? I'm scared if a rag like Jacobin is in the running. When people say that the quality of a publication has declined they often mean they disagree with things that are published. Many also say that they seek out blogs and other sources that I assume they agree with. I read these publications because I often disagree with their opinion pieces. It's a value add. Why wo…
> When people say that the quality of a publication has declined they often mean they disagree with things that are published. > a rag like Jacobin
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Economist has repeatedly and emphatically rejected the lie that the 2020 election was stolen. I'm really not seeing any "crazy leak in". Pretty much all "crazy" views I can think of the Economist rejects vigorously.
Then it's a good thing I didn't claim the Economist agreed with the Big Lie.
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#276I'm still a serious economist reader and podcast listener, especially for their special reports, but I've also started to rely more and more on a curated RSS feed of substacks & blogs.
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you have a point... and, furthermore, declinism today is just about the same as it always has been.
I have to disagree. The quality of decline has really gone downhill in the last few years. Used to be that when things fell apart, they really fell apart (think revolution, collapse) but now they just peter out.
We’re gonna start declining again. We’re gonna decline so much. We’re gonna decline at every level. We’re gonna decline economically. We’re gonna decline with the economy. We’re gonna decline with military. We’re gonna decline with healthcare and for our veterans. We’re gonna decline with every single facet.
We’re gonna decline so much you may even get tired of declining. And you’ll say “Please! Please! It’s too much declining! We can’t take it anymore. Mr President, it’s too much!”
And he’ll say “No it isn’t. We have to keep declining. We have to decline MORE! We’re gonna decline MORE! We’re gonna decline so much! I love you America. You’re gonna be so happy!”
Ahh yes. Soon. Soon.
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tend to agree with OP. Quality declined, I cancelled my subscription.
The exercise that was cancelling, including being hung up on twice during the process, is why I’d never go back.
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think its perspective. Drawing a parallel to Elon Musk. He says his political leanings haven't changed. Draw a line marked Far Left, Left, Sort of Left, Middle, Sort of Right, Right, Far Right. He says he was Left or Sort of Left, but somebody dragged the line way to the left. He is where he always was, but the line has moved.
Nah. We live in an age of asymmetric polarization. XKCD has a good rendering of the DW-NOMINATE data. Look especially at the US House since Reagan: https://xkcd.com/1127/ The right has moved far more than the left. Just looking at today's news, we find a prominent right-wing activist was convicted of plotting to overthrow the government: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63802649 The only area I think you coul…
And 1/2 of the US has ideas that do not match the current left.
Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to The Economist?
#280>Owners:
Exor N.V. (43.40%)
Rothschild
Cadbury
Schroder
Layton[1]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Group