Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a LOT more than that. You are still stuck in satoshi-era. Things have evolved quite a bit that it's no longer just a db sync
Care to elaborate?
Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
261–270 of 1001 posts
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
Care to elaborate?
I'll chime in here;e.g. Ethereum is more than a database. It's a computer. You can write and execute code on it. (but also, as OP, Stripe will almost certainly not have any use for this)
Etherium itself is not a computer, that's marketing speak.
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does a separate payment rail have to do with the US debt?
It’s a hilarious definition of “fix” but the basic argument is that when you mandate stablecoins to hold treasuries and they start seeing actual adoption, you create demand/sink for a couple extra trillion dollars of treasury bonds. Eg if Australian locals suddenly switch transacting cocaine at scale in Tether instead of AUD, the US government can borrow more money by providing that collateral to Tether. Edit: Izzy K…
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll chime in here;e.g. Ethereum is more than a database. It's a computer. You can write and execute code on it. (but also, as OP, Stripe will almost certainly not have any use for this)
Technically, it's a program, not a computer; Ethereum still needs actual computers to do the computing.
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
Care to elaborate?
I'll chime in here;e.g. Ethereum is more than a database. It's a computer. You can write and execute code on it. (but also, as OP, Stripe will almost certainly not have any use for this)
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#266Ah the layers. Okay, so one: Obviously pointless from a tech POV. There is nothing that a Stripe controlled blockchain could offer that a database could not. But then, why? Sadly, as someone who does like the ideals of true cryptocurrency, yet another way to make sure "real" crypto doesn't happen, much like what is happening to BTC. Here's hoping (yeah, it's a long shot) people see through all of this and maybe, MAYB…
Monero is pretty much what satoshi envisioned. Strong math, real value and active community. Sadly, it's getting attacked by qubic
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#267Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#268There are lots of crypto skeptics on HN (and we ourselves were disappointed with crypto's payments utility for much of the past decade), so it might be interesting to share what changed our mind over the past couple of years: we started to notice a lot of real-world businesses finding utility in stablecoins. For example, Bridge (a stablecoin orchestration platform that Stripe acquired) is used by SpaceX for managing…
A lot of us are not really deep into the finance space. Maybe there's a good reason it's left unsaid, but the question I came away with after reading that page and this comment is, why are businesses finding crypto easier/faster/better? To me, it's not 100% clear exactly who Tempo is for and not for, and why blockchain is more suitable than traditional centralized database technology here. And it sounds like this sys…
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#269Here's the play. It's very simple, and it's quite good. Stripe processes a LOT of money. The customers that get that money need to move it around. Often to banks. Stripe makes no money on that. Over the last few years, stablecoins have become a preferred means to hold and move money (for convenience, etc). Stablecoin providers make money on their float -- selling stablecoins means you get free deposits, and risk-free…
i'm still unclear what the crypto really adds to this play. stripe customers need to move their money around, and they need a trusted source to hold money. stripe could just do that. why add crypto into the mix?
Re: Stripe Launches L1 Blockchain: Tempo
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stellar was way too early.
It's still there though. Why not use it?