261–270 of 357 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Giving a pass to trillion dollars companies for them to just come next to something they are interested in, poach employees, steal IP and not give a dim to actual innovators sure will be a great incentive towards companies doing more R&D.
> steal IP if your IP is just lines on a patent you dont really have much moat in the first place.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Giving a pass to trillion dollars companies for them to just come next to something they are interested in, poach employees, steal IP and not give a dim to actual innovators sure will be a great incentive towards companies doing more R&D.
The innovators are the employers. The company doesn’t innovate. So if the employees got taken care of then the actual innovators made out well.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Giving a pass to trillion dollars companies for them to just come next to something they are interested in, poach employees, steal IP and not give a dim to actual innovators sure will be a great incentive towards companies doing more R&D.
There is no such thing as “poaching” employees - just paying them a market rate.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds good for the employees, so go Apple?
Giving a pass to trillion dollars companies for them to just come next to something they are interested in, poach employees, steal IP and not give a dim to actual innovators sure will be a great incentive towards companies doing more R&D.
Apple was in a patent dispute over this feature with Massimo. Their workaround is to calculate blood oxygen on the iPhone, using the sensors from Apple Watch. The Apple Watch hardware is otherwise the same. The back of the watch shines light of a specific wavelength into your skin and measures the reflected light. Heart rate sensing uses green (525 nm) and infrared (850–940 nm) light; blood oxygen sensing added a red…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s not for you to decide. It somebody is eating/smoking/drinking themselves to death, does that give you the right to murder them?
I don't follow your argument. Are you saying eating or smoking to death is like a CEO making bad decisions that causes their company to struggle?
Just offloading the analysis to the phone is extremely funny. It also seems like a pretty obvious solution, so I wonder if it was delayed by legal analysis and they only just decided it was likely to hold up in court.
Apple says: > This update was enabled by a recent U.S. Customs ruling. I can't find the ruling in question, though, so I'm not sure what they mean.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't follow your argument. Are you saying eating or smoking to death is like a CEO making bad decisions that causes their company to struggle?
No, it’s that murdering someone doing those things is wrong. Even if the company is clearly circling the drain that doesn’t give apple or anyone else the right to steal their staff and infringe on their ip.