Live data from Hacker News

The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber

thedrive.com

261–265 of 265 posts

Re: The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber

#261
post #68

I read once that if you tried to build WWII-era aircraft according to specs and mechanical drawings, they wouldn't fly. The real design was found in the dies and jigs that were adapted after many iterations and test flights.

You might have fitting issues with what I like to call "slide ruler error". How things came to be and are, are often at times not documented. Dimension and tolerancing is lost over time too.

Statistical quality control was not widespread at the time outside of a few enlightened industries. The Army was much more likely to buy a lot of parts where they could expect most of them would fit, rather than having all of the parts in statistical control within the tolerance limits.

Re: The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber

#262
post #122

I can't be certain, but I suspect the real problem was that the original contract was signed without requiring the technical data rights and/or delivery of the technical data. This is a common mistake made by the DoD, and can lead to extraordinarily high costs later. Just look at the notice: "The deliverables will include all technical data related to the heat exchanger disassembly, all technical data related to the…

This reminds me of the following: “In my view, shared by many blue-suiters, this marvelous airplane should still be operational but, alas, that was not to be. One of the most depressing moments in the history of the Skunk Works occurred on February 5, 1970, when we received a telegram from the Pentagon ordering us to destroy all the tooling for the Blackbird. All the molds, jigs, and forty thousand detail tools were…

Reading the article I immediately thought of the blackbird and wondered if it had suffered a similar fate.

Re: The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UK has clean drinking water despite losing its manufacturing primacy to the US 100 years ago.

Tell that to people in Flint Michigan. https://www.propublica.org/events/the-flint-water-crisis-an-... No amount of rosy thinking is going change the course of decline in this country.

Is lack of national engineering expertise in the top five reasons for the situation in Flint?

Re: The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber

#264
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would at least make sense for it to be mandatory for any vehicles or weapons used by the DoD, no?

I wonder if doing so would create a barrier to entry for the annual billions of $ of defense equipment the US sells to Saudi Arabia. For example, what if Saudi Arabia considers it a risk if another government has the technical plans? If that were the case, I expect defense contractors would be adverse to divulging those details.

And if the contractor were located in Australia or China the government could legally mandate the defense contractors give them access to the code
Post reply on HN