I read once that if you tried to build WWII-era aircraft according to specs and mechanical drawings, they wouldn't fly. The real design was found in the dies and jigs that were adapted after many iterations and test flights.
You might have fitting issues with what I like to call "slide ruler error". How things came to be and are, are often at times not documented. Dimension and tolerancing is lost over time too.
The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber
261–265 of 265 posts
Re: The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber
#262I can't be certain, but I suspect the real problem was that the original contract was signed without requiring the technical data rights and/or delivery of the technical data. This is a common mistake made by the DoD, and can lead to extraordinarily high costs later. Just look at the notice: "The deliverables will include all technical data related to the heat exchanger disassembly, all technical data related to the…
This reminds me of the following: “In my view, shared by many blue-suiters, this marvelous airplane should still be operational but, alas, that was not to be. One of the most depressing moments in the history of the Skunk Works occurred on February 5, 1970, when we received a telegram from the Pentagon ordering us to destroy all the tooling for the Blackbird. All the molds, jigs, and forty thousand detail tools were…
Re: The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
The UK has clean drinking water despite losing its manufacturing primacy to the US 100 years ago.
Tell that to people in Flint Michigan. https://www.propublica.org/events/the-flint-water-crisis-an-... No amount of rosy thinking is going change the course of decline in this country.
Re: The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its own stealth bomber
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would at least make sense for it to be mandatory for any vehicles or weapons used by the DoD, no?
I wonder if doing so would create a barrier to entry for the annual billions of $ of defense equipment the US sells to Saudi Arabia. For example, what if Saudi Arabia considers it a risk if another government has the technical plans? If that were the case, I expect defense contractors would be adverse to divulging those details.