Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Azure Active Directory" (now "Entra ID") and "Active Directory" caused me a great deal of confusion.
"Active Directory" / "Active Directory Domain Service" / "Active Directory Application Mode" / "Active Directory Lightweight Directory Services" / "Azure Active Directory" / "Entra Id" / "Active Directory Federation Services" / "Active Directory Certificate Services" / "Active Directory Rights Management Services" Ugh... and don't even get my started about the pronunciation of "Azure" (or the fact that, somehow, they…
Introducing Copilot+ PCs
251–260 of 614 posts
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#252Their "copilot" brand is so weird and... muddled. There's the AI code assistant thing that github actually started, there's the horrible chatbot maker GUI demoware, there's AI stuff you might be able to do with your sharepoint (if only you could get hold of the right ms sales rep to take your money), there's an app that does genai things on your personal MS account... And now there's a Surface rebrand? That org chart…
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#253Their "copilot" brand is so weird and... muddled. There's the AI code assistant thing that github actually started, there's the horrible chatbot maker GUI demoware, there's AI stuff you might be able to do with your sharepoint (if only you could get hold of the right ms sales rep to take your money), there's an app that does genai things on your personal MS account... And now there's a Surface rebrand? That org chart…
dotnet for me is the most obvious example of how terrible they are at branding. First there was .NET framework which was windows only (note I'm ignoring Xamarian because it was originally not owned by MS). Then they decided to do a reboot with cross platform support and named that Dotnet Core. This was honestly fine. But then we reach late in the 3.x timeframe and they declare for real and for true that Framework is…
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#254Wow that's an amazing feature!
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#255Microsoft's Strategy and Products: Microsoft is shifting away from Intel chips, favoring Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon X Elite processors. The new Qualcomm chips boast better performance, power efficiency, and battery life, aiming to compete with Apple Silicon. Microsoft is launching Copilot Plus PCs, featuring built-in AI hardware for enhanced performance. Surface AI Announcements: Major updates to the Surface lineup…
> Can be configured with up to 32GB of memory From my experience running 'AI' locally I would have expected 32GB to be the minimum spec machine. Assuming memory unification if they try to compete with Apple.
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also notable that Qualcomm is officially upstreaming kernel support for the Snapdragon Elite platform that Microsoft is pushing, so those systems may actually not suck at running Linux.
I thought Microsoft requires UEFI + secure boot for Windows, and with no disabling option in the firmware setup, for Windows Arm PC? Or maybe it was "only" Microsoft Secure Boot and you can actually use a Linux distro? If this is the latter case, can you build and run the kernel you want or not?
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#257Earlier quoted context omitted.
I cannot imagine building on Microsoft in 2024. They have aggressively thrown their weight around doing anti-consumer moves. These are the warning signs they don't need to care about their customers and can fully exploit their market monopoly. I still have ads after an update in windows 11 pro. Not to mention I have file explorer bugs and one note path hijacking annoyances. Legacy software is why we still use windows…
> Legacy software is why we still use windows. There is nothing better about windows than say, Fedora. Except, of course, the legacy software support.
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#258Billions of dollars to cram "AI" down our throats, but they can't be bothered to get Excel back up to the level of quality and performance it had 20 years ago.
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not if you tell them beware, all this will be used against you in some way in the future.
Doesn't the fact that lots of people use Facebook daily despite the scandals say something? It's abundantly clear that most people don't care about how their data are used. Here "most" means people outside HN.
Re: Introducing Copilot+ PCs
#260Being the designated "tech" person for my extended family and friends circle, I don't think I could recommend this to any of them because of the privacy nightmare. At least with Apple you have a single vendor who is vertically integrated and makes a huge song and dance about data privacy. Even if you discount their PR and marketing spin, IMHO you are still miles ahead of the likes of Microsoft + (pick one) HP, Asus,…
Are they actually collecting new data to enable these features? Or is all of this data collected no matter what version of Windows you have installed? It seems to me that what you just said is an argument against Windows in general, not against these new features.