> Here are just a few of our default-on safety measures: > • We do not allow anonymous users (i.e., without a Google Account) to join meetings created by individual accounts. So, all participants need to create Google accounts. How convenient for Google. I don't necessarily want to ascribe maliciousness here—there are certainly user-centric reasons to set it up this way. But, isn't it interesting how many of the secu…
Freedom and privacy are often at odds with security in most areas in life. During war-like situations, security (speaking in the general sense, rather than purely technical) becomes a greater concern, so those companies that have positioned themselves that way will have increased opportunities.
Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone
251–255 of 255 posts
Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
As silly as it sounds, it would probably resolve this issue perfectly. As I remember, I always got the login prompt at roughly the exact same time into the meeting, suggesting it's just set to expire after a certain amount of whole days.
Google internally is well aware of this, and in fact one internal tool most engineers use actually has an expiry a few hours short of 24h simply to prevent exactly this issue.
Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only feature I wish I could have is org-wide call recording. We are financial startup and since we need to record all calls by law - which means we need to keep our legacy PBX system that is constantly a headache.
you could automate a bot that calls in to every meeting for recording
Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone
#254It's as if a world of people have chosen to ignore how Google makes billions of dollars a year. Choosing Google rather than Zoom for privacy's sake doesn't address these concerns. Nothing is free, especially when Google is providing the service. You are the product. How are you the product with Google Meet? I can speculate, based on how it monetizes information in its other products. Google is processing all of the c…
I honestly have no idea. I think it's scary! I wrote this comment on this thread and it got flagged/removed:
"Remember, you are the product here. Free means they are working with the US government and the NSA, and this is straight up Orwellian surveillance capitalism. It’s a black box with backdoors which not even Google employees could be aware of. The NSA uses dragnet practices.[1] Don’t believe me? (Re)watch both Snowden and CitizenFour. [1] https://www.wired.com/2013/06/nsa-tapped-internet-servers/"
Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ...none of those other "competitors" seem to feel the need to have 4 different products in order to operate in this space. So? Google wants to make more money than they do. What's wrong with that? Also what's wrong with "me-too"-ism? Pepsi exists even though Coca-Cola is fine. Verizon exists even though AT&T works. What you call "me-too"-ism, I just call capitalism and healthy competition. Google's strategy has not…
I'll be honest, I personally find it hard to believe that the P/L for Hangouts Meet is remotely positive.
Any complete business suite has to have videoconferencing.
Do you genuinely think the P/L for G Suite isn't remotely positive, or will be over the next decade?
Remember it's the primary competitor to MS Office, and has been around for nearly a decade and a half at this point.