Live data from Hacker News

United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

reuters.com

251–260 of 301 posts

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#251

America is going to pay for the cronyism that merged every airplane manufacturer into one and eliminated internal competition. If you don't have internal competition, you'll collapse in the face of external competition. There is no way to get away from Boeing without getting away from the American aerospace industry entirely, a problem that didn't exist back when McDonnell Douglas was around.

I mean, one option is to break up Boeing (and Airbus). They’re far too vertically integrated.

> They’re far too vertically integrated.

You really have to be ignorant about that industry to say that.

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Airbus isn't focused on profit Why would you say that? > profit (cutting corners) Is profit the same as cutting corners?

Was it profitable for Boeing to cut corners?

It was for the execs for 20 years.

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#253
post #66

My takeaway is that Airbus and Boeing both need to make progress on their clean-sheet midsize designs. The A321XLR sounds great but it's kinda what Boeing has been doing to the 737, milking it for decades. The A320 is a newer design, for sure, but it's not young. I won't miss the 737. What I'd love to see is a twin-aisle-but-small short range aircraft. Yeah, that won't happen, but it would be comfy.

The Airbus A220 (formerly the Bombardier C-Series) is a clean sheet design and by most accounts, one of the best designs of its class today. It widely considered to be a next generation commercial aircraft, and will be unsurpassed by competitors for a couple of years until they catch up with newer designs. It’s enjoyed rave reviews by consumers and airplane nerds love it. Delta has already bought a bunch and I look f…

It's also too small

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Was it profitable for Boeing to cut corners?

It was for the execs for 20 years.

There is being prudent and then there is being negligent - I think people conflate them. I don't think there is any publicly traded company that does not care about profit - Boeing is not somehow unique in this. If the profit is competently pursued then you won't jeopardise safety beyond a certain point though - because that will in the long term impact profits and shareholders who appoint execs are not benefited by reduction in long term profits and therefore the value of the company.

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#255
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, for Airbus there is this where it looks like problems were swept under the rug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_296 ... though from the same era, there is this for Boeing which seems much worse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_rudder_issues

> for Airbus there is this where it looks like problems were swept under the rug Or this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas_Flight_72 This is the same basic design flaw that Boeing's MCAS has (allowing a single AoA sensor failure to cause the airplane to do unexpected and dangerous things), but unlike MCAS, it wasn't an ad hoc addition to deal with an issue in a redesign of an old airplane, it was designed into al…

You keep posting this, but it's simply not true- Qantas flight 72 did not experience an AoA sensor failure, and even if it had, the A330 uses all 3 independent AoA sensors and all 3 independent air data inertial reference units to command control movements.

The issue was caused by one of the ADIRU CPUs corrupting valid sensor data to produce a series of very specific spikes, hitting a specific edge case in the AoA cross-check logic that made the flight computer behave as if the erroneous data it was seeing was valid.

It's undoubtedly a serious design flaw, but it's not even remotely in the same ballpark as the Max's flagrant disregard for all process and well known design standards.

http://code7700.com/accident_qantas_72.htm

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#256
post #45

My takeaway is that Airbus and Boeing both need to make progress on their clean-sheet midsize designs. The A321XLR sounds great but it's kinda what Boeing has been doing to the 737, milking it for decades. The A320 is a newer design, for sure, but it's not young. I won't miss the 737. What I'd love to see is a twin-aisle-but-small short range aircraft. Yeah, that won't happen, but it would be comfy.

I know people that don't think a new airframe will be designed in our lifetimes, and it's hard to disagree. Why is it taking so long?

It costs billions and take a decade. This is something to need to time very right, otherwise you can miss a shift in the market (see A380) or a new technology (like a new engine) after you started, or get a competitor to release before you. In the meantime, the current backlogs are full, so there's no rush; everyone is waiting for somebody to make a move and enjoying profits in the meantime.

But it will happen in our lifetime.

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#257
post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure Boeing would have loved to have those orders, but 50 planes is not catastrophic. In terms of the aircraft group, Boeing has steadily growing 787 orders and deliveries, with about 500 orders yet to deliver. In terms of their space program, they are close to testing their manned capsule and just got a light touch program review, while SpaceX got put through the ringer. And there are other aspects to Boeing tha…

787 orders and deliveries are very nice, but the bread and butter of Boeing and Airbus remains the 737 and A320 families. As you say Boeing has 500 orders for 787 yet to deliver, but they most importantly have 4,500 of the 737 remaining to deliver. Same for Airbus, they have about 600 orders for the A350 yet to deliver, but they most importantly have over 6,000 A320 in the pipeline. The biggest issue for Boeing is th…

Thanks, interesting. Do you think this dynamic has already been priced into Boeing's stock now, which is why it did not move much on this 50 plane order?

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#258
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> just got a light touch program review, while SpaceX got put through the ringer. Is this a reference to the Organizational Safety Assessments NASA announced in response to Elon Musk smoking pot on a livestream online? I don't think that's a program review - more of a "are spacex employees smoking pot at work review." If not, could you link to some info on the reviews you are referencing?

Got any further reading on SpaceX getting a tougher review due to the pot thing? It seems kind of silly, if a CEO is seen having a glass of wine outside of work is there generally a presumption that the company / it’s employees are drunk during business hours?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/11/18/boeing-...

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#259
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It lost them money but it didn't hurt their brand. Those are great planes to fly in as a passenger, they're just not profitable in the end for Airbus. Boeing can't even keep its newest plane in the skies, and may have killed off the 737 line for good. Think another revision after the MAX is ever going to be approved?

The 737 needs to go away. It's a great plane from a different era (staircases instead of jetways). That era has long passed. They've been trying to shoehorn it in. Rather than scale up the 737 cockpit flight controls they could have scaled down the 777 cockpit. Or even developed an all new one license cockpit in the same vein as the A320 series.

One of the bigger 737 operators is Ryanair. They mostly fly to small airports, so it's staircases not jetways.

Their product and their brand are worse than bad, but they make a lot of money.

Yes, I agree the 50 year old design seems to have reached its end of life.

Re: United orders 50 new Airbus long-range jets to replace Boeing 757s

#260

What’s the state of mechanical engineering Software tooling / infrastructure On Linux and UNIX-like operating systems? I know Solidworks and AutoCAD are primarily Windows-based software, with proprietary data formats like .SLDPRT/.SLDASM (Solidworks Assembly) and high vendor lock-in. Why haven’t we seen greater adoption of scriptable, composable utilities (like a finite element analysis simulation) that might enable…

FreeCAD is not bad and used pretty extensively by the 3D printing hobbyists. It's nicely script-able with Python. However, from my experience, it's still nowhere near the level of polish that e.g. Solidworks has, so professional work is still primarily done with non-Free tools. I have no direct information, but I'd imagine the big aerospace companies have significant proprietary internal tooling, specialized to their…

> but I'd imagine the big aerospace companies have significant proprietary internal tooling

Right, but for mechanical CAD it's heavily based on Catia. The customization is more on the PLM side.

Post reply on HN