Live data from Hacker News

Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

krebsonsecurity.com

241–250 of 374 posts

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your argument is basically circular reasoning. You say the cultural attitude is based on the unambiguity of violating one's commitments. But the very amount of ambiguity and "wiggle room" we find in marital infidelity compared to corruption, torture, etc... is itself a product of American cultural standards. Culture is self-reinforcing, but you didn't explain why those standards exist, you've just shown how they get…

There's no such thing as a legal open relationship. Maybe there should be. I think the world would be a happier place if people who aren't naturally monogamous didn't have to pretend to be - to themselves, or to anyone else. The space in that place is a natural sticky area for sociopaths who enjoy lying and hurting people. Making "poly" an explicit orientation would make that space smaller and save everyone a lot of…

There's no such thing as a legal open relationship.

Can you tell me which law an open relationship would be breaking in the state of Oregon?

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Illegal, also once you've compiled a data base of PII the laws governing personal information apply to you so you can be screwed from both ways.

How can it be illegal to see the evidence for a crime? Should we just trust the government to prosecute who they say committed a crime when you and I cannot verify that the government is in the right in arresting that person? How do we know a crime was committed if it's illegal to examine the evidence? Would you like to be accused of a crime where no one can examine the evidence and help prove you innocent? Should yo…

>How can it be illegal to see the evidence for a crime?

It happens all the time, except that the defense is allowed to see the information.

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If your friends or coworkers abuse you because of their beliefs, then they are the ones causing harm, not the person who informed them. You sound like you're not giving full blame to those abusers or at least accepting that their behavior is inevitable. If you're a member of a church which abuses adulterers, and you don't think adulterers should be abused, then you're as much to blame by supporting that stance with y…

I think you're making the mistake of treating blame in this instance as though it has to add up to 100%, and blame on one party lessens it on another. If my friend's dad hates gays, I tell him his son is gay knowing it's likely to cause violence, then the father and I are both total pieces of shit. His guilt does not absolve me in the least.

Forgive my language but a saying I like to live by and I'll say to myself quite often:

"You look like an asshole pointing out that somebody else is an asshole."

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I don't think that it matters that this is a "cheating" site, your privacy should still be guarded and it's not fair that all these people are being exposed. What about those Tor sites that were recently busted. Yes, the content was far worse, but if we argue that usage of a site can be bad enough to warrant a loss in deserving your privacy protected, the difference between the two becomes only a difference in deter…

False equivalence. Adultery is not a crime. Trafficking in child pornography is. Nobody has a right to private criminality.

And nothing done entirely in consensual privacy should be a crime.

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#245

It get's me that so many people are basically saying it serves these people right for using the service. I don't think that it matters that this is a "cheating" site, your privacy should still be guarded and it's not fair that all these people are being exposed. Secondly, I'd wager that many of the users sign up to use Ashley Madison for the thrill of the idea and probably aren't actually cheaters themselves or hooki…

All parties involved can be at fault. And lots of people will think that privacy, while very important, is not quite at the same level as marital fidelity. It's like hearing that a vicious murderous mob boss had his leg shot off. Yes, the person who took his leg ought to be sent to jail, but we might not have much sympathy for the mob boss since his terrible actions led directly to those consequences.

Except that shooting someone is generally illegal, whereas having an affair is not. Allocate your sympathy as you wish, but don't pretend that a person deserves to be the victim of a crime because you or anyone else find their behavior distasteful.

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#246

Most private investigators must be spending their Sunday night trying to get everything they can on this. They can and will make money on this data. EDIT: Spelling

Most private investigators make all their money gathering evidence on worker's comp fraudsters for big insurance companies. My dad's been a licensed PI for over 25 years now and domestic cases are few and far between (maybe 1-2 per year) because Mrs Smith pissed off about her cheating husband doesn't have the cash that Bigco Insurance does and PIs charge by the hour. The insurance company has the cost of hiring a PI…

As to the sidenote, it must suck for the people who have periodic pain bad enough for them to be unable to hold a manual labor job but who can still have bouts of living a normal life. Either they have to forgo the moments of freedom they receive or risk losing any disability.

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I don't think that it matters that this is a "cheating" site, your privacy should still be guarded and it's not fair that all these people are being exposed. What about those Tor sites that were recently busted. Yes, the content was far worse, but if we argue that usage of a site can be bad enough to warrant a loss in deserving your privacy protected, the difference between the two becomes only a difference in deter…

False equivalence. Adultery is not a crime. Trafficking in child pornography is. Nobody has a right to private criminality.

There is a disappointingly large number of "privacy" advocates on this site who disagree with that.

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I don't think that it matters that this is a "cheating" site, your privacy should still be guarded and it's not fair that all these people are being exposed. What about those Tor sites that were recently busted. Yes, the content was far worse, but if we argue that usage of a site can be bad enough to warrant a loss in deserving your privacy protected, the difference between the two becomes only a difference in deter…

False equivalence. Adultery is not a crime. Trafficking in child pornography is. Nobody has a right to private criminality.

So in places where it was a crime, the argument doesn't apply? It seems quite odd to base a moral argument using legal definitions of criminality as those definitions do change. Consider the absurdity of applying such reasons to a place where certain political protests are illegal.

Also, the argument presented does not make a distinction between legal and illegal usage.

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#249
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My only concern is for those who's credit card information was used illegally. If I were an employer, I'd be concerned about hiring someone who joined this site. Most jobs put people in a position where they could "get away" with theft or other illegal activities that could deeply harm the company and I can see employers being very concerned about hiring someone associated with the site. Those folks just had their li…

I do not expect anyone to have much sympathy with the site nor its users. But still, being publicly defamed on the internet for eternity is far too harsh a punishment for cheating on your spouse. The motivations for cheating can be complicated, and while it certainly destroys many relationships, I believe that some might still be salvaged when the cheater can come clean on his/her own terms. Outing a cheater which yo…

>being publicly defamed on the internet for eternity is far too harsh a punishment for cheating on your spouse

If people really thought that were true, it wouldn't happen. Why go to all that effort unless you really believe in your cause? The most likely outcome is that given a list of millions of names, the average person will search for public figures and people they personally know, and not give a shit about the rest.

Re: Online Cheating Site AshleyMadison Hacked

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I don't think that it matters that this is a "cheating" site, your privacy should still be guarded and it's not fair that all these people are being exposed. What about those Tor sites that were recently busted. Yes, the content was far worse, but if we argue that usage of a site can be bad enough to warrant a loss in deserving your privacy protected, the difference between the two becomes only a difference in deter…

False equivalence. Adultery is not a crime. Trafficking in child pornography is. Nobody has a right to private criminality.

Adultery is a crime in some states.
Post reply on HN