Live data from Hacker News

Apple told to rewrite "Samsung didn't copy", post on front page until Dec 14th

engadget.com

241–243 of 243 posts

Re: Apple told to rewrite "Samsung didn't copy", post on front page until Dec 14th

#241
post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Android's experience has been evolving from day one." Yep from a blackberry clone to an underperforming iphone clone with some +1 features to a near parity iphone clone with some +1 features. "iOS is basically the same experience except for major features like multitasking menu, notification menu, etc (and where did those come from)." This is funny because to me the biggest feature in Android 4.2 that you're so exci…

>the biggest feature in Android 4.2 that you're so excited about is the AirPlay clone. what are you talking about? I'm very well aware of AirPlay and I'm not aware of a feature (introduced) in 4.2 that is even similar... I certainly have not mentioned any such feature today. >when I can now just order the phone to do tasks like Montgomery Scott in Star Trek IV: The One with Whales? Google Now has already leapfrogged…

"I'm not aware of a feature (introduced) in 4.2 that is even similar..."

Support for wireless display (Miracast)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history#Android...

It's described almost everywhere as AirPlay-esque functionality.

"Google Now has already leapfrogged it"

You: iOS hasn't changed in forever.

Me: example of radical changes in iOS recently.

You: Google did one of those too!

Instead of moving the goalposts just admit I was right and we can move on. I certainly don't contest the idea that Google has copied anything.

"Android can feature for feature match iOS and then go on for half a dozen more. Please let me know how that is inaccurate if you think it is."

Lists of features =/= parity in device or OS quality. If lists of features are so important why are the headline for every major Android update the claims that it's now lag free and it doesn't look like shit anymore? Seriously go back and look at what the main selling point of Froyo, Gingerbread, Honeycomb, ICS and Jellybean have been. The correct answers are performance, both, ui, both and performance. The headline feature isn't ever a feature, it's always "not sucking anymore."

And there's plenty of features that Android doesn't offer -- like regular OS updates to the vast majority of their users or LTE with both battery life and insane thinness. Or a superior media ecosystem around the world. Android devices are only now surpassing the graphics capabilities of chips Apple started shipping in March 2011.

Re: Apple told to rewrite "Samsung didn't copy", post on front page until Dec 14th

#242
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> relying on an incredibly powerful, but fragile, branding strategy Saying Apple relies on a "branding strategy" denigrates several entire fields, particularly interaction design and supply chain management. You don't seem to realize that these are important domains of expertise that can confer immense advantages on companies that do them well.

What makes apple what it is is the costumers, in essence the "branding strategy". The person holding the iPhone, they could care less about the rest.

The person holding the phone cares about a) the fact that the iPhone was easier to use than any computer before it, and b) the fact that their iPad at launch cost hundreds of dollars less than a similarly capable general purpose computer.

Re: Apple told to rewrite "Samsung didn't copy", post on front page until Dec 14th

#243
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can't find any reference to this. Could you point me at a source please?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125367616595333125.html

Fascinating - thank you!
Post reply on HN