Looks like this is the culprit's website http://www.nasimesabz.com/index.html There are links to her (4?) youtube accounts, which have all been terminated. There's a link to her instagram, which has also been terminated, however there is a cached-copy here http://www.pictame.com/tag/yesilnasim
That’s a style of web design I’ve seen before - lots of colors, different font sizes, wall of text rants... something about it screams mental instability. See Time Cube for an extreme example.
Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
241–250 of 491 posts
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#242This looks like it's going to be an increasingly big problem for the platform giants, as it pertains to their increasingly aggressive speech restrictions. As they ramp those restrictions up, I'd expect the need for security to increase accordingly. A mentally unwell person is likely to feel targeted, oppressed, threatened, harmed, etc. by being silenced. They'll feel isolated and it'll very likely feel like a persona…
> A mentally unwell person is likely to feel targeted, oppressed, threatened, harmed, etc. by being silenced. Even a perfectly healthy 'normal' person will feel this way after being (what they see as) unfairly and arbitrarily silenced / disenfranchised.
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#243She's a disgruntled Youtuber. This is her website: http://nasimabc.com/ From her page showing a screenshot of her Youtube ad revenue dashboard: > Analytics Last 28 days > Views 366,591 > Revenue $0.10 Highlighted in Red: Revenue $0.10? There's also another bit where she shows her historical vs. current traffic and makes a reasonable case that she's getting down ranked. Interesting times.
Isn't it possible that her content just wasn't that good? I mean her website is a pretty typical looking 'illuminati controls everything' crazy conspiracy site, if her content is similarly poorly produced getting down ranked seems natural.
Even so, she still had 366,591 views, which should all that matters re revenue.
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's funny how often that's a bad solution to a problem. Not always mind you ... but mostly.
She did get some wider attention to a problem that has been discussed inside the YouTube community before. While that's not something I'd want to die for, she may have reached her goal.
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
> She should have did affiliate marketing This is the modern version of "as seen on TV" ads, I've started unsubscribing to anyone that does it regularly. Advertising intermixed with content is the worst form of advertising.
People need to eat.
Nobody was promised to be a YouTube icon.
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't it possible that her content just wasn't that good? I mean her website is a pretty typical looking 'illuminati controls everything' crazy conspiracy site, if her content is similarly poorly produced getting down ranked seems natural.
> Isn't it possible that her content just wasn't that good? Even so, she still had 366,591 views, which should all that matters re revenue.
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't it possible that her content just wasn't that good? I mean her website is a pretty typical looking 'illuminati controls everything' crazy conspiracy site, if her content is similarly poorly produced getting down ranked seems natural.
> Isn't it possible that her content just wasn't that good? Even so, she still had 366,591 views, which should all that matters re revenue.
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't have to be "frothing at the mouth" to be mentally unstable. I saw her videos on Dailymotion and I had the impression that something is not right with her, can't really pinpoint or explain what it is. but definitely very awkward in front of the camera. Just my personal take on it.
I watched one video. It's possible that something was "not right with her" but then I think that's true in some small way with almost all of us (personality foibles, etc). But it's also possible she was on-edge because she was angry and frustrated by a situation that was important to her (earnings, passions, etc). Lots of people act like that when they feel upset, then you add in the pressure of a camera...
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#249Firstly, my sympathies with the people at Youtube HQ. I have many, many friends in the bay area and so this kind of thing hits close to home. Secondly, I struggle when thinking about if we should give airtime to a shooter's grievances, or reasons. Or even mention who they are. I tend to be on the side of: don't give them any air time. And certainly, don't acquiesce to this type of behavior because it is almost by def…
There are correct ways to start a discourse around censorship. Shooting people is not one of them.
Re: Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online
#250Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are talking about people with mental illness. I think the platforms produce mental illness. If you influence and produce a certain kind of behaviour through appropriate reward mechanisms and then after a few years of conditioning reduce/remove the reward what do you think happens? Mental illness. YouTube has conditioned a generation of people to chant "subscribe like and share" like a robots. The day the "subscri…
The platforms might be the difference between crazy and crazier, but nobody is going from normal to psychotic because of YT.