Live data from Hacker News

GitLab Pages

pages.gitlab.io

241–250 of 317 posts

Re: GitLab Pages

#241
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They should have just had the Code of Conduct from day 1 and not waited until they had an incident to overreact to. I've worked for many places with Codes of Conduct and diversity programs and they are usually run pretty well and are not heavy-handed or staffed with exuberant amateurs. There are proven benefits and established best practices to get it done.

What are the proven benefits?

Summary of research http://www.forbes.com/sites/ekaterinawalter/2014/01/14/reapi...

Re: GitLab Pages

#242
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GitLab.com runs the same GitLab as our users and some upgrades require downtime. Other operations should not require downtime, we have multiple application servers and load balancers. The backend services are HA except the file storage until we complete the move to CephFS.

Why did you guys choose Ceph instead of OpenStack Swift? Just curious.

I'm not sure whether we've seriously considered Swift, but high bandwidth is important to improving our performance, one area in which Ceph seems to be the better choice [0].

[0]: http://www.sparkmycloud.com/blog/a-performance-review-of-swi...

Re: GitLab Pages

#243

Yes. I lobbied several companies to terminate their enterpise contracts with github because of their racist attitudes. All switched within 2 weeks. Some to VS Team Services, some to Gitlab. My work projects went to MSFT, but I think I will transfer my side projects to gitlab from bitbucket, since they have pages now.

A remarkably versatile word this has become, 'racism'. It seems to apply to gender, to sexual orientation, sometimes even to unexpected things like taste in music...

What happened in the world the last 2-3 years? It feels like someone took a shovel, dug up some old corpses from the graveyard of political culture and set them loose on the world again. Suddenly...

...people who call themselves 'feminist' start calling for what can only be described as a war between the sexes, given that they spout the opinion that males - preferably heterosexual, middle-aged 'white' males - are the cause of anything bad in the world. They obviously did not listen to Joe Jackson when, in 'Real Men', he sang 'and if there is war between the sexes then there will be no people left'.

...people who call themselves 'anti-racist' are trying to pull just about any public debate in a racial direction by claiming that it is all caused by the colour of the skin of whomever they're focusing on. Again, if that skin colour happens to be 'white' the person generally did something heinously wrong, while the same deed performed by someone who saw a bit more sun is either 'understandable' or 'justified' or 'caused by society being mean to (person)'...

...people who call themselves something between 'male' and 'female' start claiming that gender is nothing but a social construct and that there are really more than 50 'genders' and with that is it 'racist' to call someone 'he' or 'she' as it could be that person does not consider him/herself as either of those...

Meanwhile the real world is still full of REAL racism - just go and visit any middle-eastern country while being 'black' and you'll soon find out. For some reason the 'anti-racists' don't want to touch this subject, and other who do are quickly labelled 'racist' by them.

Meanwhile the real world is still full of REAL gender discrimination - just go and visit most middle-eastern countries (amongst others) while being female and you'll soon find out. The 'feminists' don't seem to want to speak up about this, instead they label those who do as, you guessed it, 'racist'.

Meanwhile the real world is still full of REAL discrimination against those with non-mainline sexual orientations. Again, just go to one of those middle-eastern countries I mentioned while being openly homosexual and you'll soon find out. For some reason the 'gender-denialists' are quiet about this, instead labelling those who do speak up as, again, 'racist'....

Meanwhile the position of women in the 'western' world is generally on a level with that of men, give or take a few cases of institutional gender preference. This does not mean that all professions have a 50/50 share of both (yes, both, male and female... not 'all 50') genders, eg. where I live (Sweden) nearly all veterinarians are women, nearly all lumberjacks are men, women are under-represented in IT but overrepresented in social functions, etc. Is this bad? Not necessarily, it depends on WHY there is a discrepancy. Is it because men are not allowed in veterinary college? Are women not allowed near computers? Of course not, this seems to be a case of personal choice. Are women incapable of handling chainsaws? No, they are not, but they are generally less strong than men and they don't feel at home in a group of men who talk about their favourite subjects of hunting, fishing and riding snow scooters (to take an example from our local - Swedish - culture). Does that mean those lumberjacks need to go to some re-education camp to learn to talk about more gender-neutral subjects? Of course not. Should women go to re-education camps to learn to talk about hunting, fishing and snow-scooter riding? No! Should there be male quota for vet schools to combat their under-representation in this field? No, if men want to become vets they can go to vet school. Something seems to keep them from doing that, maybe the fact that the field is female-dominated?

Fortunately there is no war between the sexes and men and women still get together to create more men and women. They create 'white' ones, brown ones, 'black' ones, 'yellow' ones, 'red' ones, etc. New humans who come to this world without prejudice about the colour of their skin, and - if they are lucky enough to live in one of those western countries which are largely free of REAL racism - should be able to live their lives to the fullest - unless the 'feminists', 'anti-racists', 'gender-denialists' (for lack of a better word) and other similarly befuddled people are successful in derailing the progress of the last few hundred years and throw us back into struggle and strife.

It is almost as if all these 'isms' (feminism, anti-racism, etc) are worried of becoming irrelevant due to the progress made on these fronts in the 'west' and started looking around for new 'causes'...

Re: GitLab Pages

#245
post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Yes, you can use Pages with private projects 2. No, there are no traffic limits.

Very nice! Suggestion: if you use a CDN or other methods to improve the performance make sure to point it out in the landing page. Keep up the good job.

Thanks, we're trying to do a better job communicating everything we have and can do and will definitely do so in this case!

Re: GitLab Pages

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GitLab.com runs GitLab EE, which you can use for free.

This is a moot point to anyone running GitLab CE though.

I was a little short in my reply, my apologies.

Sytse explained our vision below [0]. We're always open to discuss this further.

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11432614

Re: GitLab Pages

#247
post #184

Yes. I lobbied several companies to terminate their enterpise contracts with github because of their racist attitudes. All switched within 2 weeks. Some to VS Team Services, some to Gitlab. My work projects went to MSFT, but I think I will transfer my side projects to gitlab from bitbucket, since they have pages now.

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11431003 and marked it off-topic.

Thank you! Definitely offtopic.

Re: GitLab Pages

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're considering adopting the same policy, see the issue linked above.

That would be amazing. (I'm not sure why I got downvoted into oblivion. I stated my honest opinion--I haven't signed up for a lot of services where I can't use the username I want.)

I can't speak for anyone else, but it seems exceptionally ridiculous to me that you'd make a choice of which technology to use based on whether or not your username is available. I don't know if I'd downvote anyone for that, but it did inspire a laugh out loud moment.

Re: GitLab Pages

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SJW is a pejorative, plain and simple. It means "shut up and stay in your place". In this particular case, the post I was replying to[0] was referring to a post[1] that I'm pretty sure was referring to racism against white people. Take that as you will. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11431762 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11431107

> SJW is a pejorative So? 'Racist' is also pejorative. Racists exist and we ought to be able to discuss their existence and harms. SJWs exists and we ought to discuss their existence and their harms as well. > It means "shut up and stay in your place" I literally laughed out loud on reading this. Of course SJW doesn't mean anyone should stay in their place. Where do you get this outrageous idea? And what is that plac…

> So? 'Racist' is also pejorative. Racists exist and we ought to be able to discuss their existence and harms. SJWs exists and we ought to discuss their existence and their harms as well.

What is a SJW?

> I literally laughed out loud on reading this. Of course SJW doesn't mean anyone should stay in their place. Where do you get this outrageous idea? And what is that place, to you?

I literally hope you enjoyed laughing out loud. What does SJW mean to you?

> I can't speak to the motives and thoughts of this particular speaker, but it seemed to me you were making a generalization about what 'SJW' really means, and making unwarranted claims about what we should be able to reliably infer from the mere use of the term.

You can't speak to this particular speaker's motives, but you can to mine? What does SJW mean to you?

I've already stated what SJW means to me, namely, the person using it is stating "I know I'm wrong, I just preferred it when people knew their place"

If you'd like me to expand upon that, I'd be glad to. I just don't understand where you're coming from.

Re: GitLab Pages

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Dear lord these guys are putting in work. man I wish they would bring something new, cool and innovative to the space, instead being bent on doing feature-by-feature copy of github. They have an amazing opportunity now to take advantage of github fatigue. But they are throwing it all away by trying to become an inferior clone of github.

It has integrated CI whereas GitHub requires using a third-party CI system, it's had Reaction Emoji (called Award Emoji for GitLab) for a while now, it has "Merge when build succeeds", CE is entirely FOSS, etc.

I'd honestly be really surprised if Github didn't end up acquiring one of those CI systems which they already integrate with.
Post reply on HN