Live data from Hacker News

News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

m.guardiannews.com

221–230 of 245 posts

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#221
post #187

With 7 billion people in the world, it's very likely that these things will happen today: - someone will get killed in a horrible car accident - a child will be killed in a freak accident - someone will die from cancer, leaving much grieving behind - someone will molest a child - someone will lose all their money in a scam - someone will get raped - someone will be killed by a never-to-be-found hit-and-run drunk driv…

Within my own social network of people I personally know or have met.

  - someone got killed in a horrible car accident (friend)
  - two people died from cancer, leaving much grieving behind (aunt, mother of sister's friend)
  - someone lost all their money in a scam (friend)
  - someone got killed by a never-to-be-found hit-and-run drunk driver (friend)
  - someone will beat a woman (neighbor)
  - someone got be murdered (someone i've met at a bar)
  - my favorite teams lost (three of them, NFL, NBA, NCAA)
All in the last 6 months, and I don't know that many people.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#223
post #177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes! Definitely! It is such an incredibly excellent book. I listened to the Audible version twice in one month (26 hours in total). I think everyone should check it out, at least for the alternate viewpoints on doing things. I actually wrote about this on my own site (link in my profile). On topic, I absolutely love the part in the book that says " Replace reading the newspaper over breakfast or dinner with activitie…

Tim, it's ok, we get it, you love your own book. Calm down babe. ;) Joking aside, the book has some very interesting ideas and personally has inspired me to seek change in my professional and personal life. Although, a blueprint everyone can follow word by word it's not.

Haha.

I agree. It has some great and inspiring ideas but definitely not a blueprint for anyone. For example, I have no desire to live abroad so I completely disregarded the travel parts of the book, which is at least half of the book's content. I mean I did listen to those parts (via audiobook), but I focused my attention elsewhere.

Whenever reading or listening to something, whether a book, podcast, or blog post, I look for at least one idea that I can apply to my own life. If I find something, then it was a worthwhile read/listen.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Think about it this way - what if someone is being raped every day in the parking ramp at your office, or murdered on the street you ride your bike to work each morning? If you heard about it on the news, you could change your route to work or ride with a buddy to increase your safety.

Nobody is going to be raped in the parking ramp at your office EVERY DAY. It may happen once but statistically it'll never happen again in that location. Someone may be murdered on the street you ride your bike to work each morning. And, unless you live in Compton its unlikely to ever happen again. And if you do live in Compton why the hell are you riding your bike to work through a war zone you moron?! :) But lets j…

[deleted]

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the article (written in 2006), Aaron Swartz wrote: "This seems to be true, but the curious thing is that I’m never involved. The government commits a crime, the New York Times prints it on the front page, the people on the cable chat shows foam at the mouth about it, the government apologizes and commits the crime more subtly. It’s a valuable system — I certainly support the government being more subtle about comm…

Seriously? Is that what happened? Completely unprovoked, the government did something bad? I kinda read that he broke the law and the government were prosecuting him for it.

The sentence they gave him seemed to have been way out of proportion to the crime he committed, and the time and taxpayer dollars that the federal prosecutor spent on him could have been spent on more significant crimes that actually put citizens in danger. So yes, I think the government did do something pretty bad here.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the article (written in 2006), Aaron Swartz wrote: "This seems to be true, but the curious thing is that I’m never involved. The government commits a crime, the New York Times prints it on the front page, the people on the cable chat shows foam at the mouth about it, the government apologizes and commits the crime more subtly. It’s a valuable system — I certainly support the government being more subtle about comm…

Seriously? Is that what happened? Completely unprovoked, the government did something bad? I kinda read that he broke the law and the government were prosecuting him for it.

The problem was that the government prosecuted him for his illegal actions and for lots of frivolous made-up charges too.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seriously? Is that what happened? Completely unprovoked, the government did something bad? I kinda read that he broke the law and the government were prosecuting him for it.

The sentence they gave him seemed to have been way out of proportion to the crime he committed, and the time and taxpayer dollars that the federal prosecutor spent on him could have been spent on more significant crimes that actually put citizens in danger. So yes, I think the government did do something pretty bad here.

3-6 months in a Club Fed jail?

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#230
post #165
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like The Economist? Are the ABC's internal metric's available? What about the audits? Their selection of journalists on current affairs shows is interesting though. Chris Uhlman's wife is an ALP MP, Barrie Cassidy was a Hawke staffer, Maxine McKew became an ALP member, Kerry O'Brien was a Whitlam staffer. It's almost like there is a pattern....

True, I was probably a bit hasty in 'always', but think that 'usually' fits. My knowledge came from a friend of mine who had some reason to be at an ABC office at one point and witnessed a meeting between the ABC staffers and the external agency, and they were concerned that their week's tallies didn't match up, as they were out 2 minutes. I imagine that the ABC's numbers would be public info somewhere, and I have no…

It depends on the monitoring. If you cook that you're golden regardless of what you do.

Actually determining bias is difficult.

There is also Meet the Press on the commercial stations and Sky News is actually well worth watching if you have it. Richo's show and Peter Van Onselen's are really good.

But reading news is far better at any rate.

Post reply on HN