Earlier quoted context omitted.
And then of course he continues (although won't make for a good social media rage point so understandable you didn't provide full context): > Well, I actually think it's a brilliant idea if it can be done in an educational way that's legal. > no free Robux, no free prizes, just a game called the dress to impress predictor where it's not like trying to get kids money or anything like that. Still, probably what he sees…
We can mince his words. In the end anyone who organize gambling for profit is scum. If you do it for charity I know form experience it is massively profitable, but.. I am not sure it is worth it for society.
As always, seems to depend on the scale.
Letting anyone in the world place bets on when the next nuke will hit a city? Probably pretty bad overall for society.
Doing raffles for some local tiny organization run by Ada and William so they can continue hosting a ten person event? Probably pretty good overall.