Live data from Hacker News

Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

prospectmagazine.co.uk

221–230 of 498 posts

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#221

WHAAAAATTTTT!!!!! “…thousands were queuing in Nairobi to have their eyeballs scanned as part of the “Worldcoin” project, founded by OpenAI chief Sam Altman. In exchange for handing over their biometric data, some 350,000 Kenyans each received 25 free crypto tokens, worth approximately $50. Those tokens were transferred directly via Kenya’s main mobile payments app, M-Pesa.” Actually that doesn’t sound so forward thin…

Haha a UUID tied to my biometrics. What could go wrong.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#222
post #59

I believe once we go fully cashless, we'll regret it and wish we could go back. I can barely enjoy a full day without being required to bring my phone / debit card with me because the register does not accept cash.

>I can barely enjoy a full day without being required to bring my phone / debit card with me because the register does not accept cash. But how do you get a regular re-supply of your cash to pay the places that take cash? For me, I would have to make a regular trips to the bank ATM machine to withdraw cash. That type of errand is inconvenient which is why I haven't done that in 15 years. It's been so long that I don'…

All my in person transactions are done with cash where possible. It is not inconvenient at all.

I withdraw a sum of cash at the beginning of each month at the bank.

I carry maybe ~150 euros whenever I’m out doing stuff.

What’s interesting is I spend less this way - and preserve my privacy.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#223
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not in the US. There are no laws requiring businesses to do so. Why would employers spend the resources required for such a thing?

Some scenarios I hope you see as obvious: - you take out cash from an ATM. The machine is loaded with sequential or logged order of SN that can be matched to withdrawals and times. - you take that cash immediately to a vending machine or supermarket auto-checkout that takes notes. The machine scans all notes it ingests and can match them to timings and purchase details. - Even a small shop might have a camera at the…

> - you take that cash immediately to a vending machine or supermarket auto-checkout that takes notes. The machine scans all notes it ingests and can match them to timings and purchase details.

I can tell you they don't do that, at least for the systems I know in Europe. And for manual systems obviously the cashier doesn't record serials and match them to transactions.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can barely enjoy a full day without being required to bring my phone / debit card with me because the register does not accept cash. Buy somewhere else (if humanly possible), and tell this to the vendor who doesn't want to accept cash.

It's not vendors but governments that are pushing for this.

Vendors also prefer it if they don't have to have cash in the store.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#225

Not using cash means someone gets a cut of a processing fee. Every time, with almost no exceptions. I’m not down to have rent seeking companies taking a slice of my hard earned money just so I don’t have to manage a few pieces of paper. You’re generally paying 3-4 percent of every transaction now, as that’s pretty standard for debit cards on businesses, and it doesn’t matter if it’s charged to the card holder or the…

There were already costs. There were always costs and risks associated with cash handling: armored trucks doing cash collection, risks of money in tills being lost. If it really were a lot cheaper you wouldn’t see businesses clamouring to go cashless. That’s not to say I think cash should go the way of the dodo, but I don’t think there’s that much difference paying g4s to collect your money vs Mastercard. IMO the ben…

I do not think so. Otherwise the British government would not have needed to outlaw charging customers more for card transactions to encourage the move away from cash.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#226
post #9

I will always recall the chaos of being in a northern Minnesota tourist town (Ely) when the single fiber-optic line serving the region was cut. I sure was glad our group brought cash. All the people with only third party companies willing to pay for them some time in the future had their trips and plans ruined. But that's sort of a trivial example. It could be much worse. And then there's the rent seeking inherent in…

>Plus cash is just so much more convient and faster. You mentioned "puritanism and censorship" as your main issue with cards (and I assume with other digital payment systems), but to the best of my knowledge that's only an issue with online payments, for which cash isn't really possible at all. Unless you feel that sending bills in an envelope to some postal address you see on a website to be fast and convenient.

When I pay with cash the transaction is settled in literally 15 seconds. When I pay with a card it takes days, involves dozens of people and many capital and mantainance heavy systems which are extremely fragile. Additionally the digital payment services provider will take their relatively large cut so the process of the transaction can drag out over even longer times and greater costs. With cash you pay only the cost and tax and you need not ever think of it again.

The experience of using cash is very simple, fast, and reliable. In the future digital payment systems may become those things but unless you're in an urban area they currently are not. Your experience of using digital payment systems in person in, say, a coastal megalopolis differs significantly from using it to buy a shovel at a hardware store in a small town. At best (with credit or debit cards) it's almost as convient as cash, most of the time.

If I want to exchange value with another human person cash makes it easy and simple. It is far from easy with digital systems involving arbitrary third party corporate persons.

As for online stuff I mostly use bitcoin.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lets be honest, bitcoin is not usable for every day transactions.

OK, honest question, have you tried it recently? Have you used a modern lightning wallet?

No. Too complicated to understand the risks. I would use it only if it becomes mainstream and user friendly.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#228
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By your logic the currency goes up when the poor get poorer

Yes, if a million poor people lose $1 each, that has the same effect as one guy losing $1 million.

If million people lose $1, nobody cares. If one guy loses 1 million he might cut costs that will affect others.

If people like Musk lose wealth because of sinking stock prices, his workers don't have suddenly more buying power.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#229
post #205
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe (even in the US!) you can pay in a check by taking a photo in your bank app.

The money isn't instant though. People paying for such services with a cheque would do well living a few weeks in someone else's shoes.

90% of the people I'm paying are businesses. If an individual wants cash they can ask and I'll pay cash. I wouldn't just assume someone prefers everyone to be paying them in cash or screwing around with various electronic payment options that aren't super-common where I live.

Re: Physical cash is dying–and you don't need to be a conspiracist to worry

#230
post #166

Not using cash means someone gets a cut of a processing fee. Every time, with almost no exceptions. I’m not down to have rent seeking companies taking a slice of my hard earned money just so I don’t have to manage a few pieces of paper. You’re generally paying 3-4 percent of every transaction now, as that’s pretty standard for debit cards on businesses, and it doesn’t matter if it’s charged to the card holder or the…

And yet, when last did you get a 3-4% discount when paying cash? I remember that from the 90s and 00s. In fact, I have seen some small places ask a 3-4% surcharge for cash payments, because banks don't process cash for free any more.

Cash only restaurants are often 10-20 percent cheaper than comparable restaurants.
Post reply on HN