Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean by outcompeting? I don't know the answer of course otherwise I wouldn't have posed the question but I guess asking questions qualifies for getting downvoted to -3. Some of you are clearly sitting on all the answers but you're not sharing them with the rest of us. We see the short term results, my question was directed at the long term. I don't think it really matters if it's crypto mining or aluminum…
What I mean by outcompeting is that if rich cryptominers are pricing poor Kazakhs out of an electricity supply which was perfectly fine before, I don't see how that counts as a win for their robustness and stability of power supply. And PoW crypto isn't like aluminium smelting. The value of aluminium smelting isn't in winning an arms race with other aluminium smelters based on how much power they consume, so if you b…
The article doesn't mention any of that though. It says that the miners got cut off (rationed) because 3 coal plants were offline. The regulator is stepping in to make sure regular people and industries are prioritized.
> The whole "crypto creates demand for innovation in power supply" only makes sense if you believe people haven't been investing in innovation in power supply because there's been barely anybody that wants cheap electricity for the past century or so! That might be the case for [formerly] tiny niches affected by new use cases, like say, lithium batteries suitable for powering vehicles. It isn't the case for Kazakh ability to keep the lights on
Investments and innovation follow demand so now that demand has risen and assuming demand stays high, what should we expect will happen? This is not unique to crypto, it just happens to be the driving force here. Of course other industries can lead to similar outcomes. If you think this will not lead to innovation and investments, you are basically saying that cryptomining deviates from the norm and you would need to justify this claim.