Live data from Hacker News

Trade War Has Damaged U.S. Chip Industry

nytimes.com

221–223 of 223 posts

Re: Trade War Has Damaged U.S. Chip Industry

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> IP protection in china is non existing which anyone who even done a little business in china knows very well. Rather than going back and forth with "Yes it is," "No it isn't," I'll provide some hard facts here. China has been ramping up IP enforcement over the past five years or so. In 2014, China began establishing specialized IP courts in major cities, and over time, more and more have been created. These courts…

Those are not hard facts. Progress isn't the same as a satisfactory situation. Anyone who has tried working in China knows exactly what the problem is. If not for Trump we wouldn't even be having this discussion and China would now have more or less complete domination on large parts of western infrastructure. I have no idea what make you think that you are making any kind of argument here. It's a known fact even by…

> Those are not hard facts.

What isn't a fact? Everything I wrote about the development of Chinese IP enforcement is detailed in the sources I listed at the end.

> It's a known fact even by the EU that china is not giving us access to their markets

That's not a known fact. American and European businesses not only have access to the Chinese market, but also have very significant presence there. China is the biggest market for Boeing and Airbus. It's the biggest market for General Motors and Volkswagen (and VW is the largest car brand in China), and the second largest market for Ford. I could go on and on like this. China is obviously still strongly export-dependent, but its consumer economy is growing quickly and foreign companies have a huge presence in that sector.

> and har not actually securing IP and are in fact forcing it onto chinese hands.

In my last comment, I cited to you the figures on the rapid growth in the number of IP disputes heard by Chinese courts. I told you about how specialized IP courts have been set up in major Chinese cities over the past five years, about how penalties for IP violations have been significantly increased, about how evidence discovery has been made easier, and about how effective foreign companies are in winning patent disputes in China (a 70% win rate). Those are facts.

I find that people outside China often have an image of the country that lags 10-20 years behind reality. The image you're painting would have been more accurate in 2009. In 2019, it's woefully out of date.

Re: Trade War Has Damaged U.S. Chip Industry

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are not hard facts. Progress isn't the same as a satisfactory situation. Anyone who has tried working in China knows exactly what the problem is. If not for Trump we wouldn't even be having this discussion and China would now have more or less complete domination on large parts of western infrastructure. I have no idea what make you think that you are making any kind of argument here. It's a known fact even by…

> Those are not hard facts. What isn't a fact? Everything I wrote about the development of Chinese IP enforcement is detailed in the sources I listed at the end. > It's a known fact even by the EU that china is not giving us access to their markets That's not a known fact. American and European businesses not only have access to the Chinese market, but also have very significant presence there. China is the biggest m…

That you take something from an extremely poor place and make it better is not the same has having lifted it to anything close to a satsifactory level.

China has no excuse for not enforcing IP rights and no excuse for their forced technology transfer. There is no defacto improvement in China thats the reality you apparently refuse to understand.

You keep missing the point of this discussion and thus the point of the conflict with China.

Re: Trade War Has Damaged U.S. Chip Industry

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes but also, people in rural areas should not have a dictatorial say in what those who live in urban areas do. If democracies like the USA (Canada has a similar problem) simply counted the votes, the majority of the country would be happier with the outcome. From a pragmatic standpoint, this is a good thing. "U.S. Cities are Home to 62.7 Percent of the U.S. Population, but Comprise Just 3.5 Percent of Land Area" htt…

You might have a system where neither side can force anything down the other side's throat. To do that, you might need something like one legislature where the cities predominate, and another where the rural has more sway. You might call it a "bicameral legislature" or something.

I'm not sure why in a democracy, the majority of people don't have the majority of the power. If they happen to be urban / rural, so be it.

The developed world is becoming more urban because we do not need that many people in the rural industries any more. It's that simple. Fighting for their 'rights' just makes the country non-competitive. We need to actively incentivize and assist those in rural areas find a way of life where the economy is actually happening.

Post reply on HN