Live data from Hacker News

How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

teybannerman.com

211–220 of 406 posts

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#212

Someone said - in Linux, everything is a file. In Microsoft, everything is a copilot. Lol.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux is in fact not the origin of the "everything is a file". More properly, "everything is a file" is a Unix concept and Unix's creators deserve credit for the idea. Though Plan9 carries it out much better: Unix networking isn't file-based, Plan9's is.

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#213
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Try to pack as much clear work into your prompt as you can so you don't go back and forth.

Do hacks like “read prompt.md, and follow its instructions. When you’re done, read it again and follow its instructions.” And then you have some background process appending to the file to keep it warm and you just keep writing there?

You could do that. I was just trying to say that if you make your original prompt complete enough, and you have well-defined success criteria, you can tell it to keep going until they are met.

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#218
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never understood this about Windows Subsystem for Linux naming, nor its predecessor Windows Services for Unix. Surely Linux is the subsystem running on Windows? Should we now reinterpret Windows for Workgroups as a means of astrally projecting your organization inside Windows 3.11?! The dative only works ONE way, Microsoft! I guess they really just didn't want a product name to start with the name of a competitor's p…

A "Windows subsystem" is a specific interface between user-mode applications and the Windows kernel. It's a technical notion that exists in Windows. So there are different Windows subsystems for different types of applications. The naming convention is "Windows subsystem for ". It makes more sense when you read it as "Windows subsystem for [running] Linux [applications]". WSL2 deviates from the native concept of what…

This, and it may have also been a legal thing. "Product for Third-Party OS" has been accepted as a descriptive use of a third-party trademark for decades, requiring only proper attribution rather than a license, whereas marketing a product that didn't even originally use the Linux kernel as a "Linux Subsystem" might have been considered riskier by Microsoft's lawyers in spite of the nonstandard use of the former.

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#219

Someone said - in Linux, everything is a file. In Microsoft, everything is a copilot. Lol.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux is in fact not the origin of the "everything is a file". More properly, "everything is a file" is a Unix concept and Unix's creators deserve credit for the idea. Though Plan9 carries it out much better: Unix networking isn't file-based, Plan9's is. Sorry, I couldn't resist.

I was thinking more along the lines of "what you're referring to as Windows is in fact Copilot/Windows"....

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#220

Ignoring the disaster that is their branding/naming. Copilot is _amazing_. Everyone is hyping about Claude, but I'm way more productive with the copilot cli. The copilot cloud agent is great, and copilot code review is great (we also tried the new very expensive claude code review - it was slow and expensive). Forget that it's Microsoft, forget that everything is Copilot and go and give it a shot.

I find a lot of devs I’ve worked with don’t even know about copilot CLI and just think copilot is the VS plugin

Due to microsoft’s confusing naming

Post reply on HN