Live data from Hacker News

Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

washingtonpost.com

211–220 of 223 posts

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many people want to either tiptoe around or flat out ignore the far right leanings of fascism to avoid what it says about the US

"Leanings"?

You're right, that's too gentle of phrasing. Fascism is a 100% far right ideology. Please excuse my Ameribrain, I'm continuously bathed in conservative capitalist and neoliberal propaganda

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand that. It's just that many people still use these passages to the present day to justify bad behavior.

That is what all religious texts and institutions effectively do. Take moral standards of centuries and millennium before and force it on today.

Sure. But only one of them seems to result in a massively disproportionate level of violence. And not just violence due to a difference of religion, but violence done in the very name of the religion

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> he was at a party and he was about to be killed I feel like your story is really missing some details.

I mean, those are the best parties

And here people thought it's LLMs who are statistical parrots...

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It reminds me a lot of the Red Guards - the greatest disaster could come from the party losing control of these groups.

Basically. Similar ideological (as in anti-authoritarian turned authoritarian) background. I have a thesis musting somewhere in Cambridge MA about this parallel.

As a layreader of history, i've noticed the more ideological, the more they are prone to authoritarianism. And it makes sense if you think about it. It's why paternalistic revolutions always devolve into authoritarian nonsense.

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is what all religious texts and institutions effectively do. Take moral standards of centuries and millennium before and force it on today.

Sure. But only one of them seems to result in a massively disproportionate level of violence. And not just violence due to a difference of religion, but violence done in the very name of the religion

Not just the one. Both old and new testament have lot of violence and mysognistic rhetoric if you read them literally.

It may not seem like it today , Christianity is a bloody religion of conquest throughout most of its history, just the last 500 years had countless genocides conducted all over the world in its name. Gold , Glory and God was the theme of all colonization, before that period we had the another 500 years of religious wars like the crusades.

Islam is hardly the sole or even the largest abuser of faith. It is merely newest major one

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#216

A friend of mine who works in a startup in Bangladesh tells me that critical infrastructure is being set on fire indiscriminately. Buildings such as data centers. He shared videos of many such burning buildings. The country doesn’t yet have resilient infrastructure. For example, internet and telecommunication go through a single point of failure. Last year, that building was accidentally set on fire and it led to 2 w…

>A friend of mine who works in a startup in Bangladesh tells me that critical infrastructure is being set on fire indiscriminately. Buildings such as data centers. He shared videos of many such burning buildings. Targeting critical infrastructure doesn't sound like purely "anarchistic" rioting to me. It sounds like something a foreign hostile power would want to happen. It reminds me of what is happening in Ukraine a…

Students didn't burn the buildings, nor any other hostile power. As the hostile power already have their puppet installed. Only building they might've burnt is the Government sponsored, tv office.

Its classic tactic employed by the government, many times over and over again. It's done by their student wing

And there are no opposition party left to do such attacks anymore, they've been systematically eradicated

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The protest WAS peaceful until one protester was killed by the Police for no reason. Not sure how you are blaming the massive countrywide internet outage on the protesters. It was literally announced by the government that they were shutting everything down to control the movement.

> The protest WAS peaceful until one protester was killed by the Police for no reason. I'm inclined to believe it, but let's be honest: protesters always say that. From their point of view that's how it always is and they are never in the wrong. Statistically it's very unlikely.

Keep in mind, in Bangladesh, no newspaper can say anything more than the government allows them to. And each newspaper reported the protest to be peaceful.

The students reacted when the pm threw a attacking comment toward them, and they were still peaceful in their reaction. Then then student wing of the party started attacking and things got violent

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s easy to encourage this when there’s nothing at stake. I personally have friends and family who are trapped and fear violent protestors as much as violent police. And when the protests die down in a few days or weeks, there will be even fewer jobs. And the attacks aren’t against the state but against the people as well.

Well obviously violence against random civilians is not justified, the target should be the state, especially leaders and security forces.

Can confidently say, all the previous student protests, along with this one, students have never been the violent one.

But we civilians are more afraid of violence from the ruling party's goon. These people are coming from some remotest parts of the country, have no good education, but empowered by the government to do anything deemed necessary to stop people's movement.

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ideally protests should be peaceful. When there's no consequences for bad authoritarian behavior, you get more of it. Your plea for law and order is (probably inadvertently) a plea for the ongoing dominance of the established order. If it's peaceful only because everyone is afraid or unable to resist, then what you have is a police state. And in authoritarian societies like that, peaceful protest doesn't make any pos…

Both sides of the political spectrum are authoritarian. Each dominant party will do whatever in their power to hold onto it. That said, law and order is needed to sustain the population. The pop density of BD is incredible - imagine half the population of US crammed into the state of New York. Systems and processes were what BD out of being considered a “basket case “ as Henry Kissinger (?) once famously called it. A…

Seeing the pictures of so called burnt "data center", I would say it was definitely not the students. But hey, it's their (government 's) game, and they can twist it around as they like.

And people were never afraid of the students, nor the students were destroying infrastructure.

People were helping the students. [0]

Targeting unarmed people with shotguns, is in no way justifiable, no matter how you want to sugarcoat it. Simply put you can plate and serve shit in a very classy manner, but at the end it will still remain shit.

[0]. https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/dhaka/352655/when-ja...

Re: Bangladesh imposes curfew after dozens killed in anti-government protests

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well obviously violence against random civilians is not justified, the target should be the state, especially leaders and security forces.

In most of these movements that discipline isn’t maintained. What do you think happens when thousands of students, many of whom are discovering a city the first time in their lives, suddenly realize they can set grand things on fire? There’s certainly the core movement that is disciplined, but its very hard to control the beasts in the fringes.

Your comment about students is absolutely unfair, and wrong.

The students are much more civilized than the goons and deployed police. The political wing of the party consists of uneducated street locals, or students who are not smart, and easy to manipulate, and looking for easy way to get to the top. I have worked with them, and I know their level.

And the students are the one who allows to go all the emergency vehicle peacefully. Never heard any students attacking an ambulance. Refer to safe roads movement by the students few years back.

Things go bad only when government goons gets involved. They are the beasts you are trying to make the students to be.

And link for you.

https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/dhaka/352655/when-ja...

Post reply on HN