Earlier quoted context omitted.
Email is a poor comparison, because you're connecting to millions of other people using gmail/yahoo/whatever, for free. The correct comparison would be if eMail was a universally paid for service. It would NOT be what it is today.
I am not comparing the aims or the essence of the service. I am expression the opinion that social networks can be a paid-for service just like email, music or video can.
Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
211–220 of 317 posts
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
The data is already in Grindr’s systems, this means it is ALSO at Localytics (and others). This is not as safe as if it was only in Grindr’s own systems.
And any of these companies could be purchased by some other entity and change their data privacy policy.
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#213Even within its confines, Grindr's data are rich for blackmail. (Consider: images and messages sent and received within 100 feet of Capitol Hill.) It was recently acquired by an offshore billionaire [1]. [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-12/china-tec...
Reminds me of the old KGB tactic where they would have agents seduce politicians and business men into compromising (recorded) sexual situations then use it for blackmail. I find it inevitable that many acting politicians on both sides of the aisle are being manipulated in this way.
-Seducing and blackmailing a hot female enemy agent. I love the honey pot.
https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_script...
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
Change of control is a huge problem when it comes to privacy sensitive data. That's also a big factor in why I have a problem with governments collecting data. You may trust the present day administration (or not...), but who knows what a future administration (or occupying force) is going to be up to (beside the obvious risk of a leak or a breach). The same goes for situations like bankruptcies and 'bad leavers', th…
> That's also a big factor in why I have a problem with governments collecting data. You may trust the present day administration (or not...), but who knows what a future administration (or occupying force) is going to be up to The standard example is how the Netherlands were rather religiously tolerant, but used to keep track of Jews for tax collection purposes before WW2. Then when the Nazis arrived, they had all t…
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#215Even within its confines, Grindr's data are rich for blackmail. (Consider: images and messages sent and received within 100 feet of Capitol Hill.) It was recently acquired by an offshore billionaire [1]. [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-12/china-tec...
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#216Earlier quoted context omitted.
Grindr wouldn’t be the only way to declare one’s STD status though. It could be omitted from one’s profile, but declared during chat, for example, or prior to hooking up.
Methinks you don't understand the problem space. Putting it in your profile is intended to save the afflicted from wasting tons of time and energy on a. talking with people who will immediately nope out when they learn your status and b. dealing with a lot of emotional BS from people who want to see themselves as nice but who aren't really ready to deal with you and your situation. That can be a hard enough conversat…
A) Mark yourself as HIV positive in your profile, which Grindr will share with third parties.
B) Directly declare yourself as HIV-positive at some point in a conversation.
I’m not suggesting there are options without drawbacks.
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That's also a big factor in why I have a problem with governments collecting data. You may trust the present day administration (or not...), but who knows what a future administration (or occupying force) is going to be up to The standard example is how the Netherlands were rather religiously tolerant, but used to keep track of Jews for tax collection purposes before WW2. Then when the Nazis arrived, they had all t…
Why did they keep those records? Different tax rates for different religions? Seems like none of their business.
It used to be common to tax different religions in a different way in some countries of Europe. Even today in Germany you are legally required to pay taxes to your church, and I have read multiple accounts of French expatriates who have discovered this only after a year of working in Germany, and getting significant amounts of back taxes to pay, as well as being required to be debaptised, etc, if they wanted to stop paying for that.
In France that would be unthinkable, but every country has its customs.
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#218So vending HIV status is a straight up HIPAA violation, I'm fairly sure that's been found to be the case over and over again -- it doesn't matter what your business is, health information is covered by HIPAA. That's 250k per violation fine, and leaking status positive or negative is a violation. And every person, and every time they pass that information to every "partner" is a distinct violation.
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yet Tinder is just one of the 150 online brands owned by IAC, a company created by legendary TV executive Barry Diller. He probably knows the value of the data they have.
Wow, today I learned: Tinder, PoF, OkCupid, Match.com and more are owned by the same company.
Re: Grindr Shares Personal Information With Third-Parties
#220Even within its confines, Grindr's data are rich for blackmail. (Consider: images and messages sent and received within 100 feet of Capitol Hill.) It was recently acquired by an offshore billionaire [1]. [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-12/china-tec...
Another data point on why you should not take money or sell your business to Chinese investors. Their price points for pricing companies is strange (e.g. a lot higher than western pricing) and it would make sense that they're doing it for other, perhaps more nefarious, reasons.