I went to a non-top tier undergraduate school. I made efforts--at big companies as well as the one I founded--to recruit from my alma mater . I ended up defaulting to NYU, Harvard and Stanford. Career services at non-top tier schools are shit. Once, as a personal favor, I offered to help a company with a well-known CEO recruit from my state school. When I brought it up with a dean I knew, career services got mad. The…
> Career services at non-top tier schools are shit. Doing my undergrad and PhD at an average large state school, I was really lucky to get an internship (and now job), essentially by word of mouth and my PhD advisor. Now that I'm doing a part-time Masters at an elite-ish (top 10) school, I'm realizing how amazing career services can be. They send out weekly emails saying: "James Dimon is coming to speak." "Dir. of En…
If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
211–220 of 496 posts
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#212Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why give special treatment to a big firm over smaller firms?
If you can host X companies over the course of a semester / year, then selecting large, well-know, well-paying companies maximizes the total salary of all students you are able to place in these companies
Your chances of being the next cto of google in 40 years is extremely low but your chances of joining a startup or working up the ladder and becoming a cto are much higher. You could be earning a lot more.
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#214If you care about diversity stop interviewing on these stupid algorithmic questions! Getting a job literally depends on buying the cracking the coding interview book and solving these stupid problems. I know some of my course mates who worked on very interesting projects but couldn't get a job because they couldn't white board a tree balancing problem :D
However, I don't really agree that this is a "diversity" problem, except perhaps weakly so in that it optimizes against people who don't want to study algorithms for interviews. But interviews by definition optimize against some subset of the general population; unless you're defining diversity so loosely that it can be satisfied by the sets `{studies algorithms for interviews}` and `{doesn't study algorithms for interviews}` (and in that case, how are they different)? That's sort of like saying a tech company shouldn't optimize its interviews for people who like to watch baseball versus people who don't - they absolutely shouldn't do that, but that's meaningless as a diversity metric, in my opinion.
How are you defining diversity?
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They just don't understand that some people like me, who can get into the (mostly private) elite schools choose to go to a "long tail" school for a variety of reasons (financial, family obligations, etc). Agreed--I was accepted everywhere I applied save one and I ended up going to the University of Maine. I've never hurt for work and I paid off my student loans by the age of 25. Google sniffs around now (aside: rec…
If the biases start with the university imagine how deep it goes.
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#216I would bet significant amounts of money that if you looked at people based on their in-job performance blinded to background you'd find insignificant contributions from education. Not interviewing, I would bet that people from top-tier schools interview very well, as I think Triplebyte discussed the other day. I'm talking about actual bottom-line performance in the job, which in my experience shows little correlatio…
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#217"""Peter Thiel: Thank you. Let me actually just start with that question. You know, I went to Stanford undergrad, Stanford law school. Throughout the '90s, I had a belief that education was absolutely paramount. We should only hire people that went to the best schools. And - and we discriminated on this basis very aggressively in hiring at PayPal. And I use this -- and I used to -- I thought this was the most important thing in our society. And over the last four or five years, I've gradually come to shift my views on it for a number of different reasons. The narrow technology context in Silicon Valley, that I saw so many very talented people who had not gone through college tracks and who had still done extraordinary well. In some ways, they were also more creative.""" Too Many Kids Go To College- Intelligence Squared U.S. https://youtu.be/7VTQ-dBYSlQ?t=468
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
I went to a major state research university for engineering. During career fairs, the big companies would always have huge lines for hours and the unknown, smaller companies would be doing their best to grab every uninterested kid walking past. The big companies were usually a waste of time to talk to (and waste of time waiting to talk to). They would sort resumes by GPA and pitch the bottom 90%. Then you would still…
If you want to one day start a startup you should stay away from big companies, the skills and experience you get at the right startup can make the difference.
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe UB stands for University at Buffalo [1] or more precisely State University of New York at Buffalo. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_at_Buffalo
as someone who grew up in Texas, I was wondering WTF UB meant and how so many people seemed to know what it was. RPI I knew because I they sent me literature while I was in high school 30 years ago.
Re: If you care about diversity, don't just hire from the same five schools
#220Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are matching the diversity of the schools' recruiting efforts. So yes, you could say they are (perhaps) unbiased vs their input, but their input has problems. In other words, their selection of schools to recruit from means they are outsourcing the distribution of your their candidate pool, and the GP poster is not happy with that aspect of the result. If it doesn't match your society or customer base, and you t…
I'm not disagreeing that the situation is bad. I just don't see how adding bias to your recruitment is a solution to the problem. If we had a bunch of women who couldn't get engineering jobs I'd understand, but we seem to have the opposite situation where everyone is competing for a limited resource. If you're proportionate to the pool, you're probably doing well.