Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Is there a better way? Yes, UBI. Then you can create what you want and your livelihood doesn't depend on it going viral.
Most people want a lot more out of life than basic necessities.
Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
201–210 of 478 posts
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#202Top of HN and people are loving it, but there's got to be a better way of getting some $$ rewards for fun viral ideas like this than "Buy me a coffee". I'm betting he's got tens of thousands of sessions currently and nobody is tipping. https://ko-fi.com/magnushambleton Is there a better way? Asking for myself, also.
I built a browser extension for a hackathon that enabled crypto payments direct to site owners. "registration" was just sticking a formatted payment address in a DNS TXT record, and if you were at a supported website, the extension would light up, and facilitated payment. I still think it's a neat idea but I can't be bothered to build a real version
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#203Top of HN and people are loving it, but there's got to be a better way of getting some $$ rewards for fun viral ideas like this than "Buy me a coffee". I'm betting he's got tens of thousands of sessions currently and nobody is tipping. https://ko-fi.com/magnushambleton Is there a better way? Asking for myself, also.
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#204Excellent idea. So many modern buildings age so poorly. Maybe this will give some starchitecs a bit of a pause...
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#205And the real killer app of contact lens AR will be ... this in reverse.
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#206And the real killer app of contact lens AR will be ... this in reverse.
That's black mirror level content.
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Is there a better way? Yes, UBI. Then you can create what you want and your livelihood doesn't depend on it going viral.
Most people want a lot more out of life than basic necessities.
I'm a psychiatry resident and developper. I have never been paid for my dev work but have produced quite a lot on my free time (site: w.olicorne.org ). I would do psychiatry pretty much no matter how much I'm paid for it.
In my view the most productive people of every field are not incentivized by money and would do it anyway. UBI would free up time and cognitive load of the most productive people I believe. Following a 80/20 kinda rule.
Hence UBI here would mean that the dev would not *have to* monetize.
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#208Wow, someone finally made Poland-filter. It all looks exactly like I'm used to.
Pretty much any place with brutalist architecture, really. I'll happily take pretty much any revival or classical style over "modern" or brutalist style. There's nothing more depressing than walking by beautiful historic old buildings only to turn a corner and see a monstrosity of concrete and glass somehow reaching the epitome of bland and uninviting.
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#209Top of HN and people are loving it, but there's got to be a better way of getting some $$ rewards for fun viral ideas like this than "Buy me a coffee". I'm betting he's got tens of thousands of sessions currently and nobody is tipping. https://ko-fi.com/magnushambleton Is there a better way? Asking for myself, also.
I built a browser extension for a hackathon that enabled crypto payments direct to site owners. "registration" was just sticking a formatted payment address in a DNS TXT record, and if you were at a supported website, the extension would light up, and facilitated payment. I still think it's a neat idea but I can't be bothered to build a real version
Re: Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ideally the model would be run locally in the browser, so the author isn't paying whatever they're paying. But the web standards to do complicated stuff locally aren't there yet and probably will never be. That's not a practical answer but it's my two cents.
I wish I could give him two cents without having to try. HTTP status 402 with micropayments or something needs to become a thing. The platforms do it... (subs, tips, donations, rewards etc etc.) Why can't the web.