Live data from Hacker News

UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

petition.parliament.uk

201–210 of 373 posts

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#201
post #3

As well as the Estonia eID system works (aside from that time it got hacked[0] and that other time they leaked all the photos[1]) and how well a digital (non-government) system works in Scandinavia… I have to say… As a Dual British/Swedish Citizen, I really do not trust the UK government. They have proven over and over and over, that at every opportunity presented they will increase their own authority. I don’t belie…

Worse than the US?

I’m honestly curious how the two are seen from the outside.

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#202

As a Brazilian, it's pretty weird when I see that countries like UK or the U.S don't have national IDs. Here that would be seen as a completely insane.

Has (everyone) having an ID stop crime?

I didn't even mention crime. Not sure why this question.

Obviously it doesn't stop all crimes, probably helps on some.

Just saying how there is a very different culture, where no one see having an ID as something weird and invasive.

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#203
Japan has a digital national ID ("MyNumber" is the name). There was a lot of pushback before it passed but it did pass. It is now the main ID that is used for national health insurance and other government services. The rollout has been rocky with bugs and whatnot, but in the past 2 years or so there's been no drama. The ID is now supported in iOS and is coming to Android soon too, so one can have their ID on their phone instead of carrying around a physical card.

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#204
post #3

As well as the Estonia eID system works (aside from that time it got hacked[0] and that other time they leaked all the photos[1]) and how well a digital (non-government) system works in Scandinavia… I have to say… As a Dual British/Swedish Citizen, I really do not trust the UK government. They have proven over and over and over, that at every opportunity presented they will increase their own authority. I don’t belie…

Our system in Estonia works well. I don't get the resistance to a digital/national id in other countries. To us it is quite bizarre. Some have explained it with a lack of trust between citizens and the country. But without such digital id it is impossible to have such digital government services as we have here. The government services need to verify and autheticate the citizen, so they only access their own data and…

As a Canadian-American living in Denmark, I've seen both sides of this. In short: trust and mistrust are _both_ self-reinforcing concepts.

To take an example - would I want the current US government to be better at compiling information across all its agencies / departments? Absolutely not. What it does with its current level of consolidation is authoritarian enough that I'm not moving back there any time soon. I hear similar sentiments from my Hungarian colleagues, who are quite familiar with competitive authoritarianism in their own country.

Of course, this mistrust becomes self-reinforcing. I don't trust the US government, so I want it to be bad at its job - but then it's bad at its job, so I see it as ineffective and bloated and continue to mistrust it.

IMHO the only way out of this spiral is the hard way: a system must do the hard work to show itself trustworthy, and it must do so _before_ people will entrust it with the information that would make the job of being trustworthy easier. As with human relationships, it takes a _lot_ more work to repair trust than it does to break it. Unlike with human relationships, you also have systemic factors: the system needs an unbroken series of good, principled leaders; it needs to visibly and credibly punish corruption, not turn a blind eye; it needs to de-escalate divisions, not inflame them; it needs various institutional safeguards to work properly, not chop away at them; it needs to allow meaningful dissent and criticism, not crack down on it; it needs to learn from expertise, not undermine it.

Most importantly: the system needs to learn from its failures, and adjust the rules and incentives of the system itself to prevent those failures from recurring. This is generational work.

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#205
post #115
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

UK already has a social credit system with our credit score, we even need to pay to see it.

That's a financial score based on previous financial transactions and contracts. It's a bit of a stretch to call it social.

I like to call it one's capitalist credit score. It's different but very much analogous.

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#206

I don't trust the UK government either. But I'm both British and Australian and I see the need for a centralised identity service. Because the alternative is that we provide our passport to every online service that 'needs' to verify our identity. Then – lo, would you believe it! – they get hacked, and now all of our data is in the wild again . I'd much rather the government, who already know everything about me beca…

Why do services need to verify identity?

What service needs a solution to verify identity that doesn't already exist?

Banks do KYC now. Employers already need a National Insurance number to employ someone. Benefits get paid to a named payee. Emergency healthcare needs no insurance and waiting lists come via a GP who indeed knows me.

What service needs a further centralised deposit of power over identity?

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#207

I don't trust the UK government either. But I'm both British and Australian and I see the need for a centralised identity service. Because the alternative is that we provide our passport to every online service that 'needs' to verify our identity. Then – lo, would you believe it! – they get hacked, and now all of our data is in the wild again . I'd much rather the government, who already know everything about me beca…

> Because the alternative is that we provide our passport to every online service that 'needs' to verify our identity. I really really really don't want to 'verify my identity' everywhere. Why the F is that normalised these days?? If I buy something online my payment and delivery address is all they should need. And all they've had to have for the last 30 years > I'd much rather the government, who already know every…

As an adult, you probably need to authenticate yourself in the following situation.

opening a bank account, getting a credit card, getting a mortgage or a loan, buying a flight ticket, signing up for internet service, signing for mobile services, buying a concert ticket and the list goes on.

What's common here is the service provider need to know you are actually the person say it is you and not someone else.

Back in the old days where we apply the service in person, you can take your driving license or passport to authenticate yourself, but with myriad of services now moving online, we need a centralised system that mimic the physical ID.

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#208
post #3

As well as the Estonia eID system works (aside from that time it got hacked[0] and that other time they leaked all the photos[1]) and how well a digital (non-government) system works in Scandinavia… I have to say… As a Dual British/Swedish Citizen, I really do not trust the UK government. They have proven over and over and over, that at every opportunity presented they will increase their own authority. I don’t belie…

> I really do not trust the UK government. They have proven over and over and over, that at every opportunity presented they will increase their own authority. I don’t believe I have personally witnessed any other advanced economy that so ardently marches towards authoritarianism.

You can safely replace the UK with any other government and it will stand. Likely the UK one just desperately trying to push dividing issues in order to distract from what really matters to the UK citizens.

Or they are just inherently stupid and just do what they are told. Its unfortunate what the UK governance degenerated into.

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#209
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Our system in Estonia works well. I don't get the resistance to a digital/national id in other countries. To us it is quite bizarre. Some have explained it with a lack of trust between citizens and the country. But without such digital id it is impossible to have such digital government services as we have here. The government services need to verify and autheticate the citizen, so they only access their own data and…

> I don't get the resistance to a digital/national id in other countries. To us it is quite bizarre. It depends on the country and its relationship with the people. If the people trust that their government represents the people's interests, there is little push-back. In countries where citizens have reason to believe their government is hijacked by interests that do not have their best interests at heart, then every…

Wow, crazy seeing the "15 minute city" conspiracy theory on HN! For those who haven't seen it, the idea of 15 minute cities is that a lot of people think it would be great to structure development of cities with the ideal of a person being able to access most of the services they want to (workplaces, schools, supermarkets, doctors) within 15 minutes (whether walking, cycling, using public transit etc.) of where they live. It's basically a target for how easily you should be able to access services without needing to travel far, and a push-back of massive suburbs zoned solely as single-family housing that force you to drive a long way to get to anything.

The more conspiratorial among us have baselessly decided the idea of "hey it would be great to build schools and things near where people live" must actually be a globalist plot to restrict people's movement to within 15 minutes of their home. It's wild!

Re: UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards

#210

I don't trust the UK government either. But I'm both British and Australian and I see the need for a centralised identity service. Because the alternative is that we provide our passport to every online service that 'needs' to verify our identity. Then – lo, would you believe it! – they get hacked, and now all of our data is in the wild again . I'd much rather the government, who already know everything about me beca…

Why do services need to verify identity? What service needs a solution to verify identity that doesn't already exist? Banks do KYC now. Employers already need a National Insurance number to employ someone. Benefits get paid to a named payee. Emergency healthcare needs no insurance and waiting lists come via a GP who indeed knows me. What service needs a further centralised deposit of power over identity?

Yes, all of these services. Plus a ton more - hotels, car hire, various government digital services.

For example I get married abroad and I need to change my name, if a system was present I could just go to a website, enter my request, identify and then wait for my new docs to arrive, all while staying abroad.

But it’s even better - banks / employers don’t need all of my information all the time, thy just need to verify that I am who I say I am at that moment, so the credentials I am giving them through a digital system can reflect that. Call it requesting a scope from a government openid system.

And I have the power to revoke that.

And all of the various little government agencies don’t need to request all the documents to bootstrap trust every single time, they can just be given a convenient (timed) access token by me.

Implemented right, it gives much less data to people in a much more convenient and secure way. I guess the “implemented right” is the problem.

But maybe that’s an orthogonal thing that needs to be solved by itself? How we have an independent central banks that doesn’t (shouldn’t) succumb to the whims of governments - they have a clear narrow mission and they are supposed to follow it regardless of what an administration would want.

If we had an “auth provider” government thing that’s mission might be more closely aligned with the population, giving a government _just enough_ data to make it efficient but so it cannot abuse it.

Built in adversity and distrust is how we finally got a government to “work” with the separation of powers and all of that, maybe we need to think about improving the political system with some know how from web tech, cause I think working efficiency, effectively and reliably in an environment of mistrust is what web tech is known for.

Post reply on HN