Earlier quoted context omitted.
> discrimination (i.e. because of its unilateral policy of zero renumeration for all publishers) Umm ianal but isn't saying all publishers don't get paid the opposite of discrimination? If they said some American companies get paid but not french etc I would totally get it.
Inal either but the way the court phrases it in the press release is that google negociated a free use licence with everyone, regardless of their financial situations, using their dominant position on the market to "force" everyone. A way of seeing this is that it might be fine for the big players for national and international news (Le monde, Le figaro ...) , but probably has a much bigger impact on small news outle…
And my suspicion is that the value to Google is likely inversely proportional to the size of the news source, and I think the smaller publishers are hurting the most. I care to some degree that the NYT shows up in Google (but not much, really) whereas I couldn't care in the least about whether a local news paper in West Virginia is indexed.