Earlier quoted context omitted.
There was a guy releasing SeaBIOS ROMs so you can install regular Linux if your device is supported. The project is dead now, but since your device is older, there's a fair chance it's supported. I used it for a Chromebox and the process was pretty straightforward. https://johnlewis.ie/custom-chromebook-firmware/rom-download...
I have a Chromebook C710 and C720 (about 5-6 years old) and I flashed the firmware on both. The C710 now runs Windows 10 and the C720 runs Fedora 31.
Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
201–210 of 275 posts
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not if you expand the $10 into a class action. That however is a lot of work.
It still doesn't add up to a lot of money. The total class of people who were trying to run Linux on the PS3 and then weren't able to just isn't that big.
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#203First of all, this was announced more than 3 years ago, and it still won't happen for another 2.5 years. Second of all, this should be treated as good news for the HN crowd: Google is transitioning from a proprietary, Chrome-only app model to the open-standard, PWA model. Who doesn't support that? There are a bunch of "typical Google cancelling a product" comments here. But for real, I simply cannot imagine any Chrom…
Off the top of my head, these were the Chrome apps I used: * VideoStream (allowed casting to Chromecast from filesystem) * PostMan * Internal tools at previous job that used MDNS None of these applications work as a PWA. All of these moved to Electron instead. Which is heavier and just as non-standard and dependent on Chromium as Chrome Apps.
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#204Typical Google move. I have a Chromebook. It was listed on the models that would support Android app, this support never came (it's still "planned", 2 years later...). Support for Linux apps didn't come, either. So now I suppose my Chromebook will be soon a useless brick. Thanks, Google. Got the message, I'll never use any product with your badge again.
ChromeOS devices don't, in general, rely on Chrome applications any more than windows laptops do. The vast majority of the "apps" you might see on your home bar are, in fact, just web links. Is there a specific app you're worried about?
Some of your branding confusion is, in fact, exactly what Google is trying to treat here. "Chrome Apps" were a particular API for persistent web applications. It doesn't mean "apps on Chrome" and it doesn't mean standards-compliant progressive web apps.
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#205First of all, this was announced more than 3 years ago, and it still won't happen for another 2.5 years. Second of all, this should be treated as good news for the HN crowd: Google is transitioning from a proprietary, Chrome-only app model to the open-standard, PWA model. Who doesn't support that? There are a bunch of "typical Google cancelling a product" comments here. But for real, I simply cannot imagine any Chrom…
As a person who uses the Hangouts chrome app daily, I have been expecting a day when I go to launch it and it wont open for the last 3 years. Google doesn't want to support "Classic Hangouts" anymore (and supposedly they killed it in October for GSuite, but not for my domain, I guess). Hangouts is one of the only ways I privately communicate with old friends and past co-workers since EVERYONE has at least one gmail a…
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
My understanding is this is the direction they are heading and I don't see this as a bad move on their part for this reason. If they were getting rid of PWAs then I would be upset.
There are some chrome apps that you can't do as a PWA or Chrome extension. For example, there's a local webserver that serves up a folder over http. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/web-server-for-chr...
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
Once they started selling $2k+ versions, yeh I kind of do think expect that actually.
Yeah, I have no idea who those are for, but the cheaper ones are great for family members who only really need to browse the Web anyway. My tech support burden is way down, and so I love Chromebooks for other people.
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#208That's too bad. Chrome Apps allows TCP/UDP communication and it could create interesting apps.
+1 I'm still using JSTorrent ( https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/jstorrent/anhdpjpo... ). It's impossible to implement the BitTorrent protocol using a webapp, which means that once Chrome Apps are gone I'll have to revert to using a native client, which I don't trust one bit.
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#209Typical Google move. I have a Chromebook. It was listed on the models that would support Android app, this support never came (it's still "planned", 2 years later...). Support for Linux apps didn't come, either. So now I suppose my Chromebook will be soon a useless brick. Thanks, Google. Got the message, I'll never use any product with your badge again.
Ah, here's a review: https://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/t-mobile-g2x-review
Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used
#210First of all, this was announced more than 3 years ago, and it still won't happen for another 2.5 years. Second of all, this should be treated as good news for the HN crowd: Google is transitioning from a proprietary, Chrome-only app model to the open-standard, PWA model. Who doesn't support that? There are a bunch of "typical Google cancelling a product" comments here. But for real, I simply cannot imagine any Chrom…