Earlier quoted context omitted.
Complying with the letter of the law. Not the spirit.
Breaking the spirit of the law, but not the letter.
Its a very practical and approachable court system for the common person comparatively.
201–205 of 205 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Complying with the letter of the law. Not the spirit.
Breaking the spirit of the law, but not the letter.
Its a very practical and approachable court system for the common person comparatively.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And pay more taxes while the rich get giant cuts
Doubling the standard deduction results in tax breaks for the working class.
More than 60% of U.S. households would get tax cuts from the Senate Republican tax plan in 2019, while 8% would pay more, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation.
By 2027, after the individual tax cuts EXPIRE, most households would see little effect, as 61% would have either tax increases or tax cuts below $100. In that year, 16% of households would have tax cuts exceeding $100 while 23% would pay more.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doubling the standard deduction results in tax breaks for the working class.
smoke and mirrors: More than 60% of U.S. households would get tax cuts from the Senate Republican tax plan in 2019, while 8% would pay more, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. By 2027, after the individual tax cuts EXPIRE, most households would see little effect, as 61% would have either tax increases or tax cuts below $100. In that year, 16% of households would have tax cuts exceeding $100 whi…
This is completely besides the fact that I find taxes to be a good thing, seeing as the only reason I even have a future is through publicly funded programs that helped pay for my education and subsidize the small town I grew up in and even my entire state. I'm plenty glad to pay back what the USA invested in me
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The comment I was replying to said "Apple is paying the taxes it is legally responsible to pay. End of story." My point is that it definitely wasn't the end of the story.
But it really is, isn’t it? Apple thought they paid their taxes and France disagreed. This happens all the time, even on personal levels.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why shouldn't you avoid paying taxes? If it's legal and you get to make more money, I don't see the issue. Especially if you're using that money to make more positive change than the government could.
Fine if you don't use roads or the internet or anything else which was funded from tax payers money.