Live data from Hacker News

Where We Came From, State by State

nytimes.com

21–29 of 29 posts

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#21
post #4

Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada were the most interesting to me. They all had considerable migration from every region of the US, plus international.

For CO and NV, I'd say it's the Rockies/skiing and Las Vegas respectively, which attract a specific personality type respectively. Arizona, I have no idea.

Seems we a lot of people coming here from Canada. Not sure if they're permanent residents, or just snowbirds. Ontario plates are pretty common (as are Illinois).

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#22
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are two big trends: - External immigration to large population centers in New York, California, Washington state, the Washington DC area and Illinois. - Inward migration of Americans leaving those denser areas to states such as TX, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, etc. where land is cheaper and the standard of living is higher for the middle class. This is not represented in the graph because it only shows the origin of st…

I can speak towards migrating to Oregon. My cost of living has dropped by about 25% while my overall quality of life, sans anything money-related, has gone up.

SSHHH! You can't let the secret out. Remember what we tell the outsiders:

"It rains here. All the time. We never see the sun. You'd hate it here."

--says the Oregon resident from Michigan by way of Arizona. :)

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#23

I would love to see something similar about Europe. I've always heard Americans move around more. I wonder if it's true.

Straight from Eurostat via (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index....):

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/images...

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#24

I wonder how relocations along towns near state boundaries, such as moving from the Arkansas side to the Texas side of Texarkana, reflect overall interstate migrations.

According to Google, Texarkana has 32k residents, so I'm betting not much.

But examples of moving within a metro area that has a larger population (NYC->NJ/CT, DC->MD/VA) might actually be statistically meaningful.

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#25
post #4

Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada were the most interesting to me. They all had considerable migration from every region of the US, plus international.

For CO and NV, I'd say it's the Rockies/skiing and Las Vegas respectively, which attract a specific personality type respectively. Arizona, I have no idea.

Colorado has a diversifying economy that was driven in the '90s by tech/telecommunications and today by the energy boom. It also has a lot of federal jobs. The cost of living isn't great compared to its neighbors, but the outdoors lifestyle is certainly a draw too. (Source: My family was among the 1 million people who moved to Colorado in the 1990s)

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#26
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can speak towards migrating to Oregon. My cost of living has dropped by about 25% while my overall quality of life, sans anything money-related, has gone up.

SSHHH! You can't let the secret out. Remember what we tell the outsiders: "It rains here. All the time. We never see the sun. You'd hate it here." --says the Oregon resident from Michigan by way of Arizona. :)

Shhhh, this is our line in Seattle. Also, it doesn't apply to the eastern parts of either state.

--says Portland-born but long time Seattle resident who now lives in...Beijing (BTW, the pollution is real and not a story just made up to keep you away).

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#27
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tight immigration restrictions were put into federal law in the 1920s, and as people born before that decade aged, they made up a smaller and smaller percentage of people in each state. The peak period of immigration to the United States, as a percentage of people who had already arrived, was about the turn of the century between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 loos…

The extreme low rate of settlement etc. in the deep south had a good deal to do with the weak economy.

Also racism and lack of air conditioning, problems that have gotten better.

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#28
post #3

Interesting to me was that there were plenty of foreigners in multiple states before 1960, it then dropped mostly to it's lowest in around 1970 and then grew again to today. So what happened in the run to the 70s that so few foreigners live in CA, NY, WA etc...

basically, asian people weren't allowed to immigrate to the US until the mid 60's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act...

Many affluent Asian countries (Japan, South Korea, etc) still do not allow any immigrants to settle. Those that do are often the "well-cultured" Southeast Asian brides from Vietnam and Thailand.

Re: Where We Came From, State by State

#29
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

basically, asian people weren't allowed to immigrate to the US until the mid 60's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act...

Many affluent Asian countries (Japan, South Korea, etc) still do not allow any immigrants to settle. Those that do are often the "well-cultured" Southeast Asian brides from Vietnam and Thailand.

uh, yeah, this is why the US is supposed to be better than all those places. at least in theory.
Post reply on HN