Live data from Hacker News

Separate the cord from the device

bookofjoe2.blogspot.com

21–30 of 52 posts

Re: Separate the cord from the device

#22
Headphones are a big one for me. By their nature, the cords are often going to get snagged and tugged on and are pretty much guaranteed to fail before the headset itself does. I'm pretty happy my current Sennheiser headphones have detachable headphone cables, though the shaky ground the company itself is on makes me wonder if I should stock up on a few...

Re: Separate the cord from the device

#23
The one integrated cord that bugs me is the one in my 1987 vintage ADA MP-1 rackmount guitar pre-amp. Every time you take thing out of the rack to do something with it, like diddle around the circuit board, there is always that cord dangling out of it and getting in the way. The connections have become flaky somewhere as well.

I keep telling myself one of these days I will convert it to a C13 connector. Or C5, it that would fit better.

Re: Separate the cord from the device

#24
post #21

One very practical reason that comes to mind is waterproofing. Kitchen counters get wet, and office desks do not. Anything with a plug is at greater risk of shorting.

Sure but that's what gfci is for no? Anyway IMO lamps are usually the worst offenders.

Not every house has GFCI, and old ones are not always retrofitted.

From top of my head, there are two main reasons:

1. C13/C14 is a bulky set of connectors, and fitting them to compact(er) things are not always easy. This also means cable needs additional care to keep somewhere else and label. Why label? See 2.

2. Not all appliances use the same amount of power. C13/C14 is an overkill for a small, non-grounded appliance. Use a figure 8 then, alright, but what happens when you mix your coffee grinder cable with your powerful hand blender's cable and use it at max power? Hot things. Not the soup, but burning cables.

In this age where we use aluminum cables because it's cheap, mixing low and high power appliances' cables will become a liability fast. Using unique connectors will make the reason to have detachable cables moot, and drive up the price.

Standardization? The awesome thing about standardization is, three are too many standards to choose from.

Re: Separate the cord from the device

#25
post #13

As much as I truly love replaceable cords, I'd be more than happy enough if I could just unscrew the shell of the device, unscrew the power wires from where they attach, and put in any cord. Where I care about waterproofing, some silicone caulk is an extremely cheap (and removable) fix. Unfortunately practically everything you can buy now is welded plastic halves, or easily-broken clips. So even when you might be abl…

This is such a terrible idea for sump pumps!

Re: Separate the cord from the device

#26
post #9

The plug between the cord and the device must be sturdy and meet regulatory standards So it is expensive It is cheaper to just attach the cord That is the reason

plenty of devices have separatable cords. My rice cooker has a PC style plug. My water kettle has a magnetic plug.

Some of that is because they want a single factory assembly line to produce one device that works in many locales. They build the rice cooker with the universal socket, then ship the right kind of cord when they package the product for a specific locale.

Re: Separate the cord from the device

#27
post #19
post #8

Regulations make detachable cords of electric kitchen appliances hard. Most need double isolation and water-proofing, hence not detachable. It could probably be done, but it likely needs a different type of connector, akin to M12/M8

Also product liability. If you give a domestic hair dryer a 12 ft cord, someone will use it in the shower. If you give an insta-pot a 6 ft cord, someone will drape it off the counter and a child will pull it. UL standards actually limit cable length for many appliances. https://www.intertek.com/standards-updates/ul-1026-electrica...

I believe you can't put an outlet on the side of a kitchen island anymore because too many toddlers were able to grab an appliance by the cable and pull it down onto their heads. In the USA at least.

Re: Separate the cord from the device

#30
post #25
post #13

As much as I truly love replaceable cords, I'd be more than happy enough if I could just unscrew the shell of the device, unscrew the power wires from where they attach, and put in any cord. Where I care about waterproofing, some silicone caulk is an extremely cheap (and removable) fix. Unfortunately practically everything you can buy now is welded plastic halves, or easily-broken clips. So even when you might be abl…

This is such a terrible idea for sump pumps!

We're not even getting serviceable devices, serviceable parts is next level.
Post reply on HN