Separate the cord from the device
bookofjoe2.blogspot.com
Separate the cord from the device
1–10 of 52 posts
Re: Separate the cord from the device
#2Re: Separate the cord from the device
#3Re: Separate the cord from the device
#4One very practical reason that comes to mind is waterproofing. Kitchen counters get wet, and office desks do not. Anything with a plug is at greater risk of shorting.
Re: Separate the cord from the device
#5Re: Separate the cord from the device
#6Re: Separate the cord from the device
#7Take one look at the mess of incompatible detachable cords that come with LED lighting fixtures from China to see what results.
They could have used bog standard IEC 320-C5 cables, but they didn't. Why? Because they wanted to cheap out on the conductor AWG and IEC 320-C5 is quite specific about the conductor gauges and current capacities.
So, the LED lighting manufacturers produced a bunch of cables that are in almost exactly the same shape and size factor as IEC 320-C5 while being just enough incompatible to not invoke the certifying authorities--all to save a couple pennies in copper.
Re: Separate the cord from the device
#8Most need double isolation and water-proofing, hence not detachable.
It could probably be done, but it likely needs a different type of connector, akin to M12/M8
Re: Separate the cord from the device
#9So it is expensive
It is cheaper to just attach the cord
That is the reason
Re: Separate the cord from the device
#10Regulations make detachable cords of electric kitchen appliances hard. Most need double isolation and water-proofing, hence not detachable. It could probably be done, but it likely needs a different type of connector, akin to M12/M8
It seems to be possible, but it’s likely cheaper to have fixed connectors.