Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
21–30 of 112 posts
Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#22Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#23Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#24LibreSSL
Linux-PAM
OpenSSH
re2c
tzdata
zlib
Those are just the ones that came to mind.
Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#25Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#26Php
Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#27Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#28In this thread: Wildly different definitions of what "widely used" means :) Did you know tools like uname [1] and cat [2] in GNU coreutils have essentially only had two contributors in the past decade? [1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=histor... [2] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=histor...
Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#29Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?
#30Many of the core library and tools are mostly finished and have very little yearly activity. How many maintainers does a project have if the last activity was one or two commits made or maybe just merged by one maintainer 3 years ago, and few more 5 years ago. Does it count as 2 maintainers, 1 maintainer, 0 maintainers? Does the "maintainer" from 5 years ago still have commit permission and how likely are they to get involved if some merge requests show up.
Even for active projects it's very common for 90% of work being done by one main maintainer.