Live data from Hacker News

Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 112 posts

Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

#28

In this thread: Wildly different definitions of what "widely used" means :) Did you know tools like uname [1] and cat [2] in GNU coreutils have essentially only had two contributors in the past decade? [1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=histor... [2] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=histor...

And most of what happens in those utilities is updating the copyright year numbers.

Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

#30
It almost feels like it's easier to list which fundamental projects have more than one active maintainer.

Many of the core library and tools are mostly finished and have very little yearly activity. How many maintainers does a project have if the last activity was one or two commits made or maybe just merged by one maintainer 3 years ago, and few more 5 years ago. Does it count as 2 maintainers, 1 maintainer, 0 maintainers? Does the "maintainer" from 5 years ago still have commit permission and how likely are they to get involved if some merge requests show up.

Even for active projects it's very common for 90% of work being done by one main maintainer.

Post reply on HN