Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: Facebook Messenger is testing in-call video ads

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 87 posts

Re: Tell HN: Facebook Messenger is testing in-call video ads

#24
Interesting find. One might argue that ad-tech went too far on this one if they are tracking conversations to place the "right" ads. Some random thoughts: Would the ad be different for caller / recipient? Why would an advertiser place their ad there while there are "safer" places on Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Disney, etc? Are ad-tech business models at the end of the innovation cycle? What's coming next?

Re: Tell HN: Facebook Messenger is testing in-call video ads

#26
post #20

Assuming this is true, who comes up with ideas like this? If I was an advertiser do I really want to pay to have my ad (video nonetheless) shown to someone while they're actively trying to have a phone call? As a user, I'd just be pissed off at the advertiser plus im not looking at my screen when talking. I guess technically this increases ad "views" metrics. But advertisers are just wasting their money. I hope the f…

Ads are often (if not always) shown to users who are actively trying to do something else. Like watching a video or reading an article. Why should this be different?

> video or reading an article

Setting aside that people load their browsers up with ad blockers to avoid those too, they're also async experiences that have no real-time social dynamics involved with them. Video calls are interpersonal and interruptions are highly problematic.

Re: Tell HN: Facebook Messenger is testing in-call video ads

#27
post #20

Assuming this is true, who comes up with ideas like this? If I was an advertiser do I really want to pay to have my ad (video nonetheless) shown to someone while they're actively trying to have a phone call? As a user, I'd just be pissed off at the advertiser plus im not looking at my screen when talking. I guess technically this increases ad "views" metrics. But advertisers are just wasting their money. I hope the f…

Ads are often (if not always) shown to users who are actively trying to do something else. Like watching a video or reading an article. Why should this be different?

Yes, but in the cases you mentioned the user is interacting with the same pane of glass. In this case, the user's interaction is voice, not the screen.

Also not to mention that calls are very private. And the impression it gives to consumers that their call is being used for ads or even tracking.

Re: Tell HN: Facebook Messenger is testing in-call video ads

#30

Assuming this is true, who comes up with ideas like this? If I was an advertiser do I really want to pay to have my ad (video nonetheless) shown to someone while they're actively trying to have a phone call? As a user, I'd just be pissed off at the advertiser plus im not looking at my screen when talking. I guess technically this increases ad "views" metrics. But advertisers are just wasting their money. I hope the f…

I am certain the advertisers love this. All ads are intrusive, and generally the more intrusive the more expensive.
Post reply on HN