Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
21–30 of 634 posts
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#22It’s not that hard to just say that the idea of creating huge monetary incentives to harass, interrupt, or just distract people in public was a bad idea.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#23> the video was “designed to spread love and compassion” Hmmm.... seems more likely designed to get engagement. Presumably he doesn't love the woman, as he doesn't know anything at all about her, so that one is a lie for a start. And I guess he doesn't feel any compassion for her either, as he hasn't taken it down without forcing her to contact him, which she probably doesn't want to do.
I think it's not lack of compassion but lack of understanding. He probably thinks the lady is trying to milk the episode for likes. I'm guessing he has no capacity to comprehend that her life may not revolve around social media likes.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#24> He wholeheartedly apologises to Maree if she was offended by what he did and urges her to contact him privately so he can personally apologise. > If she requests him to take down the video he will do that. The video should've been taken down already.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
It depends on the country. Filming someone in public where they are the subject of the video (or photo) without their consent is illegal in France. If this had been recorded in France instead of Australia, the rights of the subject (the woman) to her image would trump any right to film in a public place of a Tiktok creator.
Derek Chauvin would appreciate that.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
The irony is it that shows the exact opposite of love and compassion. Self-aggrandizement and no regard for others, motivated only by the needs of self, and didn't even spend an extra second with her beyond what was required to execute this vapid stunt.
I don't want to tar an entire generation with the same brush, but I have noticed that younger people seem to be really taken in with these very shallow like-farming operations on YouTube and TikTok. Mr Beast is incredibly successful at this, in that his stunts produce massive numbers for very little outlay. A friend's kid in his teens was telling me about how he's the most generous person he's ever seen and it make m…
I hope anyway.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#27I always find these videos cheesy and fake and assumed they had received legal permission (if not hired actors to pose). If these jerks are filming and posing unwilling participants in their product, that seems pretty easy to remedy.
I remember a few years ago pornhub had a decision to get positive consent from people in videos to prevent revenge porn and other types of content. I guess TikTok needs something similar for videos with1M+ views.
It seems TikTokpays out between 2 and 4 cents per thousand views [0]. So if this video has 59M views it seems the creator made between $1,180 and $2,360.
So should be a simple small claims lawsuit. Maybe add in treble damages.
What would be really fun is to use the messed up class action lawsuit apparatus to create a class of victims that are in these videos that are uncompensated and just sue TikTok directly.
I like how the creator offered to take the video down, if asked. No apology and no offer to give back the money he made from the video.
[0] https://www.thetealmango.com/technology/how-much-does-tiktok...
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#2859m views. What about the money?
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#29I don’t know if it’s news but she’s kinda right in calling it out for how fake and sinister these trends are and how these people profit from them
I had a fun experience with the Instagram-effect recently. I tried to visit an arboretum earlier this year (don't judge me, it's interesting!) and I couldn't get near the viewing platform because someone had a crew lighting their shots for Instagram. They asked me to wait for a couple of minutes to get finished, which I did. Ten minutes later a crowd had built up on the ramp and I just pushed past and said "all right good work today everyone we got what we need that's a wrap!". It's nuts.
It's also weirdly disturbing to me that the presence of someone with an expensive looking camera was enough for a lot of them to just walk on past instead of enjoying the day out they paid for.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#30Really, putting things on the groud or some other higher surface to free your hands should be a basic human skill by now.