- Today: Huawei could have eavesdropped on a foreign telecom.
- Tomorrow: Huawei didn't eavesdrop on a foreign telecom. Imagine if they did though. Chills.
I'm so over this.
21–30 of 148 posts
- Today: Huawei could have eavesdropped on a foreign telecom.
- Tomorrow: Huawei didn't eavesdrop on a foreign telecom. Imagine if they did though. Chills.
I'm so over this.
NSA tapped German Chancellery for decades, WikiLeaks claims : https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/08/nsa-tapped-g... Supposedly, that did actually happen.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2015/06/25/opinions/france-spy-claims
[2] https://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/marco-rubio-nsa-spyin...
[3] https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2018-10-...
I dunno how newsworthy the "Huawei" part of this is. The options seem to be go with a local provider or accept some level of risk of exfiltrated data. For example, nobody is pretending that Cisco is trustworthy. I'm sure the Chinese spies made off with some stuff that they shouldn't have because they'd be stupid not to - but if anything this sounds so brazen that I assume the access was mostly for routine tech suppor…
Actually, it's very fashionable to suspect Huawei of whatever, and ban them from doing whatever.
NSA tapped German Chancellery for decades, WikiLeaks claims : https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/08/nsa-tapped-g... Supposedly, that did actually happen.
But it's not really news that spy agencies spy. Although maybe a little bit that NSA was spying on Germans, but that's probably not really news either, even for the Germans.
But if a private corp. doing contract work for another entity spies - and when the ownership of that corp is tied the government - that's news.
The question marks as to whether this was merely 'Huawei as admins have access' or 'Huawei has access and abused it' ... is the high relevant issue that needs to be fully sorted out.
NSA tapped German Chancellery for decades, WikiLeaks claims : https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/08/nsa-tapped-g... Supposedly, that did actually happen.
NSA tapped German Chancellery for decades, WikiLeaks claims : https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/08/nsa-tapped-g... Supposedly, that did actually happen.
- Yesterday: Huawei eavesdropped on a foreign telecom! - Today: Huawei could have eavesdropped on a foreign telecom. - Tomorrow: Huawei didn't eavesdrop on a foreign telecom. Imagine if they did though. Chills. I'm so over this.
The spin on this situation is dumb. What it amounts to is that KPN hired Huawei on a contract basis to administer its equipment, and as a result those contract administrators had... administrator privileges on the Huawei equipment. Now, obviously telco equipment can be used for spying, but there's absolutely no allegation of wrongdoing here at all. If there is any finger to point, it's at KPN for hiring an untrusted…
> for hiring an untrusted contractor So you agree Huawei cannot be trusted. I think that is the whole point of the discussion.
The spin on this situation is dumb. What it amounts to is that KPN hired Huawei on a contract basis to administer its equipment, and as a result those contract administrators had... administrator privileges on the Huawei equipment. Now, obviously telco equipment can be used for spying, but there's absolutely no allegation of wrongdoing here at all. If there is any finger to point, it's at KPN for hiring an untrusted…
> for hiring an untrusted contractor So you agree Huawei cannot be trusted. I think that is the whole point of the discussion.
Not sure why Huawei is unique here.